GNU bug report logs - #61852
‘scheme48-prescheme’ is not reproducible

Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Package: guix; Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN>; dated Mon, 27 Feb 2023 21:04:01 UTC; Maintainer for guix is bug-guix@HIDDEN.

Message received at 61852 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 61852) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Mar 2023 10:45:13 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Mar 03 05:45:13 2023
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59709 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1pY2uW-0007Gz-OU
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 05:45:13 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60436)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1pY2uU-0007Gk-Uv
 for 61852 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 05:45:11 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1pY2uN-0000aA-FD; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 05:45:03 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To:
 From; bh=CU69ecfKykzE87u0OZlo0G3RsaH5cfXbJNXzYfeZ9Ks=; b=TWtkMsxmsQ3cx0Vxa0xO
 /GBFCgjbYyxmoYLIqeDQHSKjI2lV9ng6U/NcT0pf/VYUvxEgo09VVnu2qR/ok+RTyej+AO6OJlo0t
 bS6FzVSkhMWXZf+OvhbNfaxML+X625emuXtG+NsETCpWXr+oEX43gd1StlyRD0mZTxQYubVkcHitW
 4z+rJE4bvO7cgpftub96eiDhlvDnLIVsh3y1pQcynzCfWNZfOLagfs+t9s5+ioAcPSJc69EQA7tGe
 S1N87YsG1Q08ZnsqrJQC1h6JxO3LJSTYFgNupCYXaz0534REphxQviZWsm0m4emI54RRdfX+qkBsC
 piMtZ1Q8RP0Hcg==;
Received: from [193.50.110.138] (helo=ribbon)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1pY2uM-0005Qr-Qi; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 05:45:03 -0500
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
To: Andrew Whatson <whatson@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#61852: =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=98scheme48-prescheme=E2=80=99?= is
 not reproducible
References: <87zg8yhlcr.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <ce426348-bd75-a2ed-885b-92f1caf11f37@HIDDEN>
X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/
X-Revolutionary-Date: Tridi 13 =?utf-8?Q?Vent=C3=B4se?= an 231 de la
 =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution=2C?= jour de la Fumeterre
X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5
X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4  0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5
X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 11:45:01 +0100
In-Reply-To: <ce426348-bd75-a2ed-885b-92f1caf11f37@HIDDEN> (Andrew
 Whatson's message of "Tue, 28 Feb 2023 15:55:23 +1000")
Message-ID: <878rgeyuz6.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 61852
Cc: 61852 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Hi,

Andrew Whatson <whatson@HIDDEN> skribis:

> Comparing hex dumps of the files, there are significant differences,
> and a quick dive through the image dumping code leads into VM and
> garbage collector details which are over my head.
>
> I guess patching Scheme 48 to build deterministic images is
> out-of-scope and maybe an issue for upstream.

Yes, probably!  Would you mind reporting it upstream?

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.
Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#61852; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 61852 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 61852) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2023 08:34:04 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 28 03:34:03 2023
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49630 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1pWvQw-0005Oa-5I
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 03:34:03 -0500
Received: from reservoir.hosting-cloud.net ([103.146.113.7]:47789)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <whatson@HIDDEN>) id 1pWsxm-0000iz-Ec
 for 61852 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 00:55:50 -0500
X-Mailborder-Info: host=console.hosting-cloud.net, gmt_time=1677563742,
 scan_time=4.35s
X-Mailborder-Spam-Score: 2.2
X-Mailborder-Spam-X: xx
X-Mailborder-Spam-Report: URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS, ALL_TRUSTED, SPF_FAIL,
 DKIM_SIGNED, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS, DKIM_INVALID, MB_DMARC_FAIL,
 KAM_DMARC_QUARANTINE, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, NICE_REPLY_A, 
Received: from cp61.hosting-cloud.net (unknown [103.119.110.239])
 by smtp.hosting-cloud.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D4F37FC08;
 Tue, 28 Feb 2023 16:55:34 +1100 (AEDT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.hosting-cloud.net 3D4F37FC08
Authentication-Results: console.hosting-cloud.net;
 dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none)
 header.from=tailcall.au
Authentication-Results: console.hosting-cloud.net;
 spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=whatson@HIDDEN
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.hosting-cloud.net 3D4F37FC08
Authentication-Results: smtp.hosting-cloud.net;
 dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key;
 unprotected) header.d=tailcall.au header.i=@tailcall.au header.b="BFeaOJwx"; 
 dkim-atps=neutral
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tailcall.au
 ; s=x;
 h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:
 To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:
 Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc
 :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:
 List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=HHtOad9Gwr/F27j7b+CKo+tMZ9KUGo6lspT3hqvey/E=; b=BFeaOJwxvFTtwIhKaQ8/x3fqKS
 HfERluIheC6bjUr0dWwDZUCwrDo3aiuwP5EA8uCCDSOoRH5JZQoQ/S35Mzomt1S1pw+u+qrkWE/mZ
 9a0Av+pwgKHF92Kosw42B/AoFw8UdUyVvcGJPyR+F6huje7WR5YcyYi6/8oqAikOJw365PS2UyiHg
 w6Ha+ARrS22VGpeoe3BkHeJoeA/umWRoIt4vK3BMVaHMhfRnTzYS2TbbIxZke2/7DN1lkRZ9lir2e
 F/8K0WjKXmuQN6sbBRmUIhXeby8iXDpbNC8357ebl6H/0l8shHFH5cXPIqaM9j9SsTArSuIHdzMLc
 qbT+h3Fg==;
X-Spam-Status: No
X-HostingCloud-MailScanner-From: whatson@HIDDEN
X-HostingCloud-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached,
 score=-2.988, required 4, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00,
 BAYES_00 -1.90, NICE_REPLY_A -0.09, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS 0.00)
X-HostingCloud-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-HostingCloud-MailScanner-ID: 1pWsxR-00AtR3-1f
X-HostingCloud-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
 information
Received: from eft1854679.lnk.telstra.net ([101.187.131.186] helo=[10.0.9.6])
 by cp61.hosting-cloud.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96)
 (envelope-from <whatson@HIDDEN>) id 1pWsxR-00AtR3-1f;
 Tue, 28 Feb 2023 16:55:25 +1100
Message-ID: <ce426348-bd75-a2ed-885b-92f1caf11f37@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 15:55:23 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.8.0
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IGJ1ZyM2MTg1Mjog4oCYc2NoZW1lNDgtcHJlc2NoZW1l4oCZIGlz?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?_not_reproducible?=
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=c3=a8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>, 61852 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
References: <87zg8yhlcr.fsf@HIDDEN>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Andrew Whatson <whatson@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87zg8yhlcr.fsf@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-AuthUser: whatson@HIDDEN
X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 61852
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 03:34:01 -0500
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--)

Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi again Andrew,
> 
> It turns out that the package is not reproducible:
> 
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> $ ./pre-inst-env  guix challenge scheme48-prescheme
> /gnu/store/qkby7f4nr3lxlm16zmswmka5hgfs6spw-scheme48-prescheme-1.9.2 contents differ:
>    no local build for '/gnu/store/qkby7f4nr3lxlm16zmswmka5hgfs6spw-scheme48-prescheme-1.9.2'
>    https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/qkby7f4nr3lxlm16zmswmka5hgfs6spw-scheme48-prescheme-1.9.2: 0fahr4s5qz980zz96xmrwf8r87w56kicxr8s80fvis98q7v5czll
>    https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/qkby7f4nr3lxlm16zmswmka5hgfs6spw-scheme48-prescheme-1.9.2: 0jphmcmijk68phwq93qbzszy5pdmnasa3qdcp2nc5wqc25a7kpxk
>    differing file:
>      /lib/scheme48-1.9.2/prescheme.image
> 
> 1 store items were analyzed:
>    - 0 (0.0%) were identical
>    - 1 (100.0%) differed
>    - 0 (0.0%) were inconclusive
> $ git log |head -1
> commit cf9e0508b26196dc985302776d860a0359652c59
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> 
> Any idea what might be wrong?

Hmm, interesting!

This is an image produced by Scheme 48 dumping its VM state into a file 
which can be loaded later to save parsing/expansion time.  This is the 
same technique used by Scheme 48 to produce its own initial image.  It 
looks like the "scheme48" package has the same problem:

```
$ guix challenge scheme48
/gnu/store/9c47l5cn60zrr9sm0hn55zibf8zmv33l-scheme48-1.9.2 contents differ:
   local hash: 0pyygj4nf8fw2xpciy81d01r2b2339bxhgpfdn2zq2wqvsn2ycra
 
https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/9c47l5cn60zrr9sm0hn55zibf8zmv33l-scheme48-1.9.2: 
0pyygj4nf8fw2xpciy81d01r2b2339bxhgpfdn2zq2wqvsn2ycra
 
https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/9c47l5cn60zrr9sm0hn55zibf8zmv33l-scheme48-1.9.2: 
12wxxqxmpdqgg2fzbcbm68h1jqynz9gqhxzalyspqq7hh2fgr46k
   differing file:
     /lib/scheme48-1.9.2/scheme48.image

1 store items were analyzed:
   - 0 (0.0%) were identical
   - 1 (100.0%) differed
   - 0 (0.0%) were inconclusive
```

Comparing hex dumps of the files, there are significant differences, and 
a quick dive through the image dumping code leads into VM and garbage 
collector details which are over my head.

I guess patching Scheme 48 to build deterministic images is out-of-scope 
and maybe an issue for upstream.

> Thanks,
> Ludo’.

Cheers!
Andrew
Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#61852; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2023 21:03:41 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 27 16:03:41 2023
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48954 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1pWkeq-0003IF-Od
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 16:03:41 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:51978)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1pWkel-0003I3-Hd
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 16:03:39 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1pWkel-0003Yi-2N
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 16:03:35 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1pWkek-0006DD-Qd
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 16:03:34 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:Subject:To:From:in-reply-to:
 references; bh=KahzvBIvGNopJQXOeRJ/5RlIkxBF+W7qrZYOXNJpv0w=; b=fMzfCY8a5BnAAs
 der84UtYd+EiSNVn2vbGBRkHgiDItQpyZ9qpeUR/2irKW0S0ZCZsH99g9Jh6Clue6dpZBBeOmvRb3
 i2mAQqT5k0uHseaYSe5KdTjDZcyCn3ERuaMzQLcLgWtDhmMGh67wBZcsjssL0e3Q6mQartE/kh3ZD
 lZsRC+bv+xEGT28ZYaDzFYVeYSLcYNRsWCq5PLO85PLcosXWm9+W9AHH9J3cA/Zz02+LeNk0BuJgQ
 U+hzbu3N2aaiLHkkyhhqI2T8EUBkF5u7eazb9umq+vJE9VY6T49nQIliH4UckmatikCUHd8dv0iAe
 ZxFFLo/2YOpjoZRlT/DQ==;
Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net ([91.160.117.201] helo=ribbon)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1pWkek-0003d1-EF
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 16:03:34 -0500
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
To: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Subject: =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=98scheme48-prescheme=E2=80=99?= is not reproducible
X-Debbugs-Cc: Andrew Whatson <whatson@HIDDEN>
X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/
X-Revolutionary-Date: Nonidi 9 =?utf-8?Q?Vent=C3=B4se?= an 231 de la
 =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution=2C?= jour du Marsault
X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5
X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4  0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5
X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 22:03:32 +0100
Message-ID: <87zg8yhlcr.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Hi again Andrew,

It turns out that the package is not reproducible:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ ./pre-inst-env  guix challenge scheme48-prescheme
/gnu/store/qkby7f4nr3lxlm16zmswmka5hgfs6spw-scheme48-prescheme-1.9.2 conten=
ts differ:
  no local build for '/gnu/store/qkby7f4nr3lxlm16zmswmka5hgfs6spw-scheme48-=
prescheme-1.9.2'
  https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/qkby7f4nr3lxlm16zmswmka5hgfs6spw-scheme4=
8-prescheme-1.9.2: 0fahr4s5qz980zz96xmrwf8r87w56kicxr8s80fvis98q7v5czll
  https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/qkby7f4nr3lxlm16zmswmka5hgfs6spw-s=
cheme48-prescheme-1.9.2: 0jphmcmijk68phwq93qbzszy5pdmnasa3qdcp2nc5wqc25a7kp=
xk
  differing file:
    /lib/scheme48-1.9.2/prescheme.image

1 store items were analyzed:
  - 0 (0.0%) were identical
  - 1 (100.0%) differed
  - 0 (0.0%) were inconclusive
$ git log |head -1
commit cf9e0508b26196dc985302776d860a0359652c59
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Any idea what might be wrong?

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.
Acknowledgement sent to Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to whatson@HIDDEN, bug-guix@HIDDEN. Full text available.
Report forwarded to whatson@HIDDEN, bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#61852; Package guix. Full text available.
Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Last modified: Fri, 3 Mar 2023 11:00:01 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.