GNU logs - #69466, boring messages

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#69466: Wrong colours for QA
Resent-From: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 10:51:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.69466.B.170920384310628 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 69466 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:49:40 +0100
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <ZeBhRBe3IEuXRXkp@jurong>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a0c:e300::1; envelope-from=andreas@HIDDEN;
 helo=hera.aquilenet.fr
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Hello,

it looks like the dark green colour is wrongly chosen in QA,
for instance here:
   https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/69441
The issue has been reviewed, but "Comparison unavailable
Yet to process revision".

I think dark green should only appear when the package is reviewed
AND builds correctly (so would be light green without reviewing).

Andreas

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#69466: Acknowledgement (Wrong colours for QA)
Message-ID: <handler.69466.B.170920384310628.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <ZeBhRBe3IEuXRXkp@jurong>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 69466
X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix
Reply-To: 69466 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 10:51:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-guix@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 69466 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
69466: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D69466
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#69466: Wrong colours for QA
Resent-From: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:29:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.69466.B69466.171380330713792 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>
Cc: 69466 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <ZeBhRBe3IEuXRXkp@jurong> (Andreas Enge's message of "Thu, 29 Feb
 2024 11:49:40 +0100")
References: <ZeBhRBe3IEuXRXkp@jurong>
User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.2; emacs 29.3
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 17:27:58 +0100
Message-ID: <87o7a11hwx.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> writes:

> it looks like the dark green colour is wrongly chosen in QA,
> for instance here:
>    https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/69441
> The issue has been reviewed, but "Comparison unavailable
> Yet to process revision".
>
> I think dark green should only appear when the package is reviewed
> AND builds correctly (so would be light green without reviewing).

When implementing this I chose to have the review trump any other status
since hopefully any failing builds will have been taken in to account by
the reviewer.

I think it's useful to highlight when there's a review regardless of the
other information that QA has.

1: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/qa-frontpage.git/tree/guix-qa-frontpage/issue.scm#n163

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAmYmkA5fFIAAAAAALgAo
aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF
ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh
aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9Xe6Uw/+IhlEsmFVcnyAXQjd6cUDdhRK88o5g6HU
dArwnvLcN9en9zBHxXcw5VsbYC+ENqdMXq3TrNcah0Sj4xkUC21MQA6s6ohCfGU6
D0rCwURlI9lL8bx2BAnPicUjJjSO1In76iBajQEpBVyI7nOYo3n/cL8dF32u7m1K
D/xEWgg19/lrR978kbfTWNGWyoEAVF00RAo+ZVRamKMl6C3gjNAPu9NqnWJja3iA
kVQmzLRt3Pcrv8vJ8eDd/oeSiTN7HVZRSrBX99dzRZl01UIDDf/ke5vkHzc+Yiwg
5h1NBy5g9d3k1z8VvU/ViBh21mVPlrr/i0WbRzNg3XeY8eJv6iBFX6hh8PP9k13A
sQRIrCzKm1Eey0lnUm3vHJi3vZD91AdgRhAoIrjc0czhxTzx831mLw4x1BU8vAhH
lKzNINVmbFs1/uWU8SxtWQrrpTPPWvTByvogsyHthw4XgIRCvUewxqIuQfVqgq1B
DLzg88QVSUalqELRhVM2UtpnNceACKffNjCdoaF0YOLkKShfpt7DO40NagCZ7qBN
zPNYRL/lx21k7XmxhkG+4qfQzYCKazFUYh572Z7LoYqJAc/BkiFtVm8/7xPP72wT
fnTGDnnwgA2sMVxDOOw3hoB4FUzNfyiWZ/qzMEbyU/PCnqDZfRPYmp8PWv/KWimO
oUSGBRYizxI=
=i/S7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#69466: Wrong colours for QA
Resent-From: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 13:43:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.69466.B69466.171439816511110 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN>
Cc: 69466 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:42:13 +0200
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <Zi-jtSsP1HDEk1el@jurong>
References: <ZeBhRBe3IEuXRXkp@jurong>
 <87o7a11hwx.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87o7a11hwx.fsf@HIDDEN>
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

Am Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 05:27:58PM +0100 schrieb Christopher Baines:
> When implementing this I chose to have the review trump any other status
> since hopefully any failing builds will have been taken in to account by
> the reviewer.

My impression is that reviews happen often before the package has reached
the status of being built on QA.

Andreas

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#69466: Wrong colours for QA
Resent-From: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 14:30:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.69466.B69466.171440099213211 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69466
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>
Cc: 69466 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 69466-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B69466.171440099213211
          (code B ref 69466); Mon, 29 Apr 2024 14:30:02 +0000
Received: (at 69466) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2024 14:29:52 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57543 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1s1S0u-0003R1-9M
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 10:29:52 -0400
Received: from mira.cbaines.net
 ([2a01:7e00:e000:2f8:fd4d:b5c7:13fb:3d27]:41585)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1s1S0s-0003Qv-UJ
 for 69466 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 10:29:51 -0400
Received: from localhost (unknown [212.132.255.10])
 by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5935627BBE2;
 Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:29:29 +0100 (BST)
Received: from felis (localhost.lan [127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 758987ed;
 Mon, 29 Apr 2024 14:29:29 +0000 (UTC)
From: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <Zi-jtSsP1HDEk1el@jurong> (Andreas Enge's message of "Mon, 29 Apr
 2024 15:42:13 +0200")
References: <ZeBhRBe3IEuXRXkp@jurong> <87o7a11hwx.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <Zi-jtSsP1HDEk1el@jurong>
User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.2; emacs 29.3
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:29:28 +0100
Message-ID: <87frv4z1h3.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> writes:

> Am Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 05:27:58PM +0100 schrieb Christopher Baines:
>> When implementing this I chose to have the review trump any other status
>> since hopefully any failing builds will have been taken in to account by
>> the reviewer.
>
> My impression is that reviews happen often before the package has reached
> the status of being built on QA.

I think that's fine too, QA is meant to be helpful not limiting.

I do still take this in to account when merging, not pushing things to
master if I'd like to see more things build, either just for substitute
availability, or because I'm on the lookout for build failures.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=gBbr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--

Message sent:

MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#69466: closed (Wrong colours for QA)
CC: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Message-ID: <handler.69466.D69466.174600402110320.ackdone <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <aBHoJdnyJzuj6OR4@jurong> <ZeBhRBe3IEuXRXkp@jurong>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: closed 69466
X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 09:08:02 +0000
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1746004082-10459-0"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

------------=_1746004082-10459-0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Your message dated Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:06:45 +0200
with message-id <aBHoJdnyJzuj6OR4@jurong>
and subject line Close
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #69466,
regarding Wrong colours for QA
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@HIDDEN)


--=20
69466: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D69466
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

------------=_1746004082-10459-0
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Feb 2024 10:50:43 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33709 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1rfdzu-0002lM-V3
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 05:50:43 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:33480)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <andreas@HIDDEN>) id 1rfdzs-0002lD-LV
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 05:50:41 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <andreas@HIDDEN>) id 1rfdzB-0005wA-MS
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 05:50:00 -0500
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a0c:e300::1])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <andreas@HIDDEN>) id 1rfdz9-000485-Ct
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 05:49:57 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C64348;
 Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:49:47 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hera.aquilenet.fr
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id n1w1sk5qPBTl; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:49:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from jurong (sauterelle.math.u-bordeaux1.fr [147.210.16.128])
 by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6662F17D;
 Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:49:46 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:49:40 +0100
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>
To: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Subject: Wrong colours for QA
Message-ID: <ZeBhRBe3IEuXRXkp@jurong>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a0c:e300::1; envelope-from=andreas@HIDDEN;
 helo=hera.aquilenet.fr
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Hello,

it looks like the dark green colour is wrongly chosen in QA,
for instance here:
   https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/69441
The issue has been reviewed, but "Comparison unavailable
Yet to process revision".

I think dark green should only appear when the package is reviewed
AND builds correctly (so would be light green without reviewing).

Andreas




------------=_1746004082-10459-0
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Received: (at 69466-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Apr 2025 09:07:01 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39596 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1uA3PB-0002gK-9K
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 05:07:01 -0400
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:45534)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <andreas@HIDDEN>) id 1uA3P5-0002fp-SF
 for 69466-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 05:06:56 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C95A75F7;
 Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:06:48 +0200 (CEST)
Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr;
	none
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at hera.aquilenet.fr
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id Tpqns7ZQmerQ; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:06:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from jurong (176-179-191-150.abo.bbox.fr [176.179.191.150])
 by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 84B2A567;
 Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:06:47 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:06:45 +0200
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>
To: 69466-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Close
Message-ID: <aBHoJdnyJzuj6OR4@jurong>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: C95A75F7
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [8.40 / 15.00]; SPAM_FLAG(5.00)[];
 NEURAL_SPAM(3.00)[1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[];
 MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[];
 MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
 TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[];
 RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[];
 FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]
X-Spamd-Bar: ++++++++
X-Rspamd-Action: add header
X-Rspamd-Server: hera
X-Spam-Level: ********
X-Spam: Yes
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 69466-done
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Closing an old bikeshedding issue.

Andreas



------------=_1746004082-10459-0--

Message sent:

MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#69466: closed (Close)
Message-ID: <handler.69466.D69466.174600402110320.notifdone <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <aBHoJdnyJzuj6OR4@jurong> <ZeBhRBe3IEuXRXkp@jurong>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 69466
X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix
Reply-To: 69466 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 09:08:02 +0000
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1746004082-10459-1"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

------------=_1746004082-10459-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Your bug report

#69466: Wrong colours for QA

which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 69466 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

--=20
69466: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D69466
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

------------=_1746004082-10459-1
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Received: (at 69466-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Apr 2025 09:07:01 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39596 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1uA3PB-0002gK-9K
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 05:07:01 -0400
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:45534)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <andreas@HIDDEN>) id 1uA3P5-0002fp-SF
 for 69466-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 05:06:56 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C95A75F7;
 Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:06:48 +0200 (CEST)
Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr;
	none
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at hera.aquilenet.fr
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id Tpqns7ZQmerQ; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:06:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from jurong (176-179-191-150.abo.bbox.fr [176.179.191.150])
 by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 84B2A567;
 Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:06:47 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:06:45 +0200
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>
To: 69466-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Close
Message-ID: <aBHoJdnyJzuj6OR4@jurong>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: C95A75F7
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [8.40 / 15.00]; SPAM_FLAG(5.00)[];
 NEURAL_SPAM(3.00)[1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[];
 MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[];
 MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
 TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[];
 RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[];
 FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]
X-Spamd-Bar: ++++++++
X-Rspamd-Action: add header
X-Rspamd-Server: hera
X-Spam-Level: ********
X-Spam: Yes
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 69466-done
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Closing an old bikeshedding issue.

Andreas



------------=_1746004082-10459-1
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Feb 2024 10:50:43 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33709 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1rfdzu-0002lM-V3
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 05:50:43 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:33480)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <andreas@HIDDEN>) id 1rfdzs-0002lD-LV
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 05:50:41 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <andreas@HIDDEN>) id 1rfdzB-0005wA-MS
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 05:50:00 -0500
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a0c:e300::1])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <andreas@HIDDEN>) id 1rfdz9-000485-Ct
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 05:49:57 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C64348;
 Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:49:47 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hera.aquilenet.fr
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id n1w1sk5qPBTl; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:49:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from jurong (sauterelle.math.u-bordeaux1.fr [147.210.16.128])
 by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6662F17D;
 Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:49:46 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:49:40 +0100
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>
To: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Subject: Wrong colours for QA
Message-ID: <ZeBhRBe3IEuXRXkp@jurong>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a0c:e300::1; envelope-from=andreas@HIDDEN;
 helo=hera.aquilenet.fr
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Hello,

it looks like the dark green colour is wrongly chosen in QA,
for instance here:
   https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/69441
The issue has been reviewed, but "Comparison unavailable
Yet to process revision".

I think dark green should only appear when the package is reviewed
AND builds correctly (so would be light green without reviewing).

Andreas




------------=_1746004082-10459-1--

Last modified: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 09:15:01 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.