Received: (at 69466-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Apr 2025 09:07:01 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 30 05:07:01 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39596 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1uA3PB-0002gK-9K for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 05:07:01 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:45534) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <andreas@HIDDEN>) id 1uA3P5-0002fp-SF for 69466-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 05:06:56 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C95A75F7; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:06:48 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr; none X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tpqns7ZQmerQ; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:06:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jurong (176-179-191-150.abo.bbox.fr [176.179.191.150]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 84B2A567; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:06:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:06:45 +0200 From: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> To: 69466-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Close Message-ID: <aBHoJdnyJzuj6OR4@jurong> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: C95A75F7 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [8.40 / 15.00]; SPAM_FLAG(5.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM(3.00)[1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-Spamd-Bar: ++++++++ X-Rspamd-Action: add header X-Rspamd-Server: hera X-Spam-Level: ******** X-Spam: Yes X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 69466-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Closing an old bikeshedding issue. Andreas
Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>:Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>:Received: (at 69466) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2024 14:29:52 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 29 10:29:52 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57543 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1s1S0u-0003R1-9M for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 10:29:52 -0400 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([2a01:7e00:e000:2f8:fd4d:b5c7:13fb:3d27]:41585) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1s1S0s-0003Qv-UJ for 69466 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 10:29:51 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [212.132.255.10]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5935627BBE2; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:29:29 +0100 (BST) Received: from felis (localhost.lan [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 758987ed; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 14:29:29 +0000 (UTC) From: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN> To: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#69466: Wrong colours for QA In-Reply-To: <Zi-jtSsP1HDEk1el@jurong> (Andreas Enge's message of "Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:42:13 +0200") References: <ZeBhRBe3IEuXRXkp@jurong> <87o7a11hwx.fsf@HIDDEN> <Zi-jtSsP1HDEk1el@jurong> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.2; emacs 29.3 Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:29:28 +0100 Message-ID: <87frv4z1h3.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 69466 Cc: 69466 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> writes: > Am Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 05:27:58PM +0100 schrieb Christopher Baines: >> When implementing this I chose to have the review trump any other status >> since hopefully any failing builds will have been taken in to account by >> the reviewer. > > My impression is that reviews happen often before the package has reached > the status of being built on QA. I think that's fine too, QA is meant to be helpful not limiting. I do still take this in to account when merging, not pushing things to master if I'd like to see more things build, either just for substitute availability, or because I'm on the lookout for build failures. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAmYvrshfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9XfTBg/+OnuTME437szYuOmtKNsvHqdnXWFFChvk 1FaCyDF7RzzJWqoaoAWF8YgyIpa9xF42tazm8a26t/omyvSLEQPndRQZDJCduPGO AaGLvlZKAQpzv7PZCZpA6rZjkmlb7Va3z40xs4HlDmX4bvzFbbHtKG/7moffwXP4 P/7+aT8DnjINyZdK3e0pjjzLhkKCpHJDVGtGXrHQ1l03OSLGAiuW9U35EFrZ6GRi gVm76E5qZsg0/6FMKWah81JyW/4S1fLiuaDEZr8V2l9CH8K4lAfz+5/yoJlpJdbd /pmu51gYR0DMeGehpWgFw+73osgiNzNOcG7egnkWQFzEH8nNkRodap5+QwBFjLrW abOGoV32UpUQiyBjo092uaKwiSAInVrCc9Q/do/vjOGkBSIbt+2KUPJRtUiXO+w7 rezlezfaGN57B2GpAZOqBfT9M8gfzxOtQWjdz+eIxeK7NVCJ76y9vAWhtnjKDsr3 uF8S5wI8+4KQrJvUB2cW1DBWVtSnpEcOKKRyL/zO+DfWwWVQPIZWCLxrcCEeDI1Z 9+Jm86UTYdw1FJehuV9d4SZPkeXCaGQYoSND/vJn5cm18R9gN6p819dCVWpgQbLc 0HeYbq0ufJa68dk/yXTFyvaP0NWnr18O8VKXYP5wKoBh8JhcIBhPxhMbT6J6i1MF qDQRHNbe10w= =gBbr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#69466; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 69466) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2024 13:42:45 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 29 09:42:45 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57346 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1s1RHJ-0002t8-3Q for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 09:42:45 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:42926) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <andreas@HIDDEN>) id 1s1RHG-0002t2-Hv for 69466 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 09:42:43 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFCBB165A; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:42:15 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eWZy-SVXQMjg; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:42:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jurong (unknown [IPv6:2001:861:c4:f2f0::c64]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 388A73C6; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:42:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:42:13 +0200 From: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> To: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#69466: Wrong colours for QA Message-ID: <Zi-jtSsP1HDEk1el@jurong> References: <ZeBhRBe3IEuXRXkp@jurong> <87o7a11hwx.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87o7a11hwx.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 69466 Cc: 69466 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Am Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 05:27:58PM +0100 schrieb Christopher Baines: > When implementing this I chose to have the review trump any other status > since hopefully any failing builds will have been taken in to account by > the reviewer. My impression is that reviews happen often before the package has reached the status of being built on QA. Andreas
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#69466; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 69466) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Apr 2024 16:28:27 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 22 12:28:27 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46693 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rywWn-0003aE-IU for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 12:28:26 -0400 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([2a01:7e00:e000:2f8:fd4d:b5c7:13fb:3d27]:56565) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1rywWh-0003Z4-Rv for 69466 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 12:28:24 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [212.132.255.10]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08AE816AFC; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 17:28:01 +0100 (BST) Received: from felis (localhost.lan [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 71e150ee; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:28:00 +0000 (UTC) From: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN> To: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#69466: Wrong colours for QA In-Reply-To: <ZeBhRBe3IEuXRXkp@jurong> (Andreas Enge's message of "Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:49:40 +0100") References: <ZeBhRBe3IEuXRXkp@jurong> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.2; emacs 29.3 Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 17:27:58 +0100 Message-ID: <87o7a11hwx.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 69466 Cc: 69466 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> writes: > it looks like the dark green colour is wrongly chosen in QA, > for instance here: > https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/69441 > The issue has been reviewed, but "Comparison unavailable > Yet to process revision". > > I think dark green should only appear when the package is reviewed > AND builds correctly (so would be light green without reviewing). When implementing this I chose to have the review trump any other status since hopefully any failing builds will have been taken in to account by the reviewer. I think it's useful to highlight when there's a review regardless of the other information that QA has. 1: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/qa-frontpage.git/tree/guix-qa-frontpage/issue.scm#n163 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAmYmkA5fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9Xe6Uw/+IhlEsmFVcnyAXQjd6cUDdhRK88o5g6HU dArwnvLcN9en9zBHxXcw5VsbYC+ENqdMXq3TrNcah0Sj4xkUC21MQA6s6ohCfGU6 D0rCwURlI9lL8bx2BAnPicUjJjSO1In76iBajQEpBVyI7nOYo3n/cL8dF32u7m1K D/xEWgg19/lrR978kbfTWNGWyoEAVF00RAo+ZVRamKMl6C3gjNAPu9NqnWJja3iA kVQmzLRt3Pcrv8vJ8eDd/oeSiTN7HVZRSrBX99dzRZl01UIDDf/ke5vkHzc+Yiwg 5h1NBy5g9d3k1z8VvU/ViBh21mVPlrr/i0WbRzNg3XeY8eJv6iBFX6hh8PP9k13A sQRIrCzKm1Eey0lnUm3vHJi3vZD91AdgRhAoIrjc0czhxTzx831mLw4x1BU8vAhH lKzNINVmbFs1/uWU8SxtWQrrpTPPWvTByvogsyHthw4XgIRCvUewxqIuQfVqgq1B DLzg88QVSUalqELRhVM2UtpnNceACKffNjCdoaF0YOLkKShfpt7DO40NagCZ7qBN zPNYRL/lx21k7XmxhkG+4qfQzYCKazFUYh572Z7LoYqJAc/BkiFtVm8/7xPP72wT fnTGDnnwgA2sMVxDOOw3hoB4FUzNfyiWZ/qzMEbyU/PCnqDZfRPYmp8PWv/KWimO oUSGBRYizxI= =i/S7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#69466; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Feb 2024 10:50:43 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 29 05:50:43 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33709 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rfdzu-0002lM-V3 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 05:50:43 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:33480) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <andreas@HIDDEN>) id 1rfdzs-0002lD-LV for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 05:50:41 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <andreas@HIDDEN>) id 1rfdzB-0005wA-MS for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 05:50:00 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a0c:e300::1]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <andreas@HIDDEN>) id 1rfdz9-000485-Ct for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 05:49:57 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C64348; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:49:47 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n1w1sk5qPBTl; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:49:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from jurong (sauterelle.math.u-bordeaux1.fr [147.210.16.128]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6662F17D; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:49:46 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:49:40 +0100 From: Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN> To: bug-guix@HIDDEN Subject: Wrong colours for QA Message-ID: <ZeBhRBe3IEuXRXkp@jurong> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a0c:e300::1; envelope-from=andreas@HIDDEN; helo=hera.aquilenet.fr X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hello, it looks like the dark green colour is wrongly chosen in QA, for instance here: https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/69441 The issue has been reviewed, but "Comparison unavailable Yet to process revision". I think dark green should only appear when the package is reviewed AND builds correctly (so would be light green without reviewing). Andreas
Andreas Enge <andreas@HIDDEN>:bug-guix@HIDDEN.
Full text available.bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#69466; Package guix.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.