GNU logs - #72588, boring messages

Message sent to bug-gzip@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#72588: performance bug regarding CRC32 algorithm implementation
Resent-From: Daniel Ruf <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gzip@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 06:53:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.72588.B.172344555832582 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 72588 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Daniel Ruf <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 08:51:50 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+_CZ9UNr17JrY076gjFKw7-4Lg6KMGNSvWTxy_zsq6ZpR=UQg@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001da80f061f76ee41"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::52d;
 envelope-from=ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN; helo=mail-ed1-x52d.google.com
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)

--0000000000001da80f061f76ee41
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

During my research regarding faster gzip implementations I found
https://medium.com/@techhara/speeding-up-system-gzip-by-60-75edbc8ac0e8

Is the article correct and the implementation should be updated, or is the
benchmark flawed?

--0000000000001da80f061f76ee41
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"auto">During my research regarding faster gzip implementations =
I found=C2=A0<a href=3D"https://medium.com/@techhara/speeding-up-system-gzi=
p-by-60-75edbc8ac0e8">https://medium.com/@techhara/speeding-up-system-gzip-=
by-60-75edbc8ac0e8</a><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Is the =
article correct and the implementation should be updated, or is the benchma=
rk flawed?</div></div>

--0000000000001da80f061f76ee41--

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Daniel Ruf <ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#72588: Acknowledgement (performance bug regarding CRC32
 algorithm implementation)
Message-ID: <handler.72588.B.172344555832582.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <CA+_CZ9UNr17JrY076gjFKw7-4Lg6KMGNSvWTxy_zsq6ZpR=UQg@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 72588
X-Gnu-PR-Package: gzip
Reply-To: 72588 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 06:53:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-gzip@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 72588 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
72588: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D72588
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-gzip@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#72588: performance bug regarding CRC32 algorithm implementation
Resent-From: p.z.l <p.z.l@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gzip@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 12:21:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.72588.B.17238108145094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 72588 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="2KACIFTPJFPNDMBNKXTLInhgwp"
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: GWP-Draft
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 09:36:39 +0200
Priority: normal
From: p.z.l <p.z.l@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <f39e34139a224e3cbe1d9617e87fc647@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <<CA+_CZ9UNr17JrY076gjFKw7-4Lg6KMGNSvWTxy_zsq6ZpR=UQg@HIDDEN>>
References: <CA+_CZ9UNr17JrY076gjFKw7-4Lg6KMGNSvWTxy_zsq6ZpR=UQg@HIDDEN>
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=193.222.135.158; envelope-from=p.z.l@HIDDEN;
 helo=mx-out.tlen.pl
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001,
 SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 08:20:11 -0400
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)

--2KACIFTPJFPNDMBNKXTLInhgwp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Is the article correct and the implementation should be updated, or is the =
 benchmark flawed?   I&#39;ll go classic - it&#39;s not a bug it&#39;s a fe=
ature.   lists.gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gzip/2023-11/=
msg00000.html=0D

--2KACIFTPJFPNDMBNKXTLInhgwp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

<div><br></div><div class=3D"nh_extra"><blockquote class=3D"nh_quote" style=
=3D"border-left: 2px solid #999; padding-left: 8px; margin: 0;"><div id=3D"=
gwp7d01f648"><div>Is the article correct and the implementation should be u=
pdated, or is the<br></div><div>benchmark flawed?<br></div></div></blockquo=
te></div><div><br></div><div>I'll go classic - it's not a bug it's a featur=
e.<br></div><div><br></div><div><a href=3D"https://lists.gnu.org/archive/ht=
ml/bug-gzip/2023-11/msg00000.html">https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-g=
zip/2023-11/msg00000.html</a><br></div>
--2KACIFTPJFPNDMBNKXTLInhgwp--

Message sent to bug-gzip@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#72588: performance bug regarding CRC32 algorithm implementation
Resent-From: p.z.l <p.z.l@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gzip@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 12:21:03 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.72588.B72588.17238108145085 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 72588 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, ruf.shagentur@HIDDEN
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="2KACIFTPJFPNDMBNKXTLInhgwp"
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: GWP-Draft
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 09:36:39 +0200
Priority: normal
From: p.z.l <p.z.l@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <f39e34139a224e3cbe1d9617e87fc647@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <<CA+_CZ9UNr17JrY076gjFKw7-4Lg6KMGNSvWTxy_zsq6ZpR=UQg@HIDDEN>>
References: <CA+_CZ9UNr17JrY076gjFKw7-4Lg6KMGNSvWTxy_zsq6ZpR=UQg@HIDDEN>
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

--2KACIFTPJFPNDMBNKXTLInhgwp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Is the article correct and the implementation should be updated, or is the =
 benchmark flawed?   I&#39;ll go classic - it&#39;s not a bug it&#39;s a fe=
ature.   lists.gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gzip/2023-11/=
msg00000.html=0D

--2KACIFTPJFPNDMBNKXTLInhgwp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

<div><br></div><div class=3D"nh_extra"><blockquote class=3D"nh_quote" style=
=3D"border-left: 2px solid #999; padding-left: 8px; margin: 0;"><div id=3D"=
gwp7d01f648"><div>Is the article correct and the implementation should be u=
pdated, or is the<br></div><div>benchmark flawed?<br></div></div></blockquo=
te></div><div><br></div><div>I'll go classic - it's not a bug it's a featur=
e.<br></div><div><br></div><div><a href=3D"https://lists.gnu.org/archive/ht=
ml/bug-gzip/2023-11/msg00000.html">https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-g=
zip/2023-11/msg00000.html</a><br></div>
--2KACIFTPJFPNDMBNKXTLInhgwp--

Last modified: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:45:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.