Received: (at 73962) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Oct 2024 12:57:39 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 23 08:57:39 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58964 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1t3avi-0002Th-Tp
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 08:57:39 -0400
Received: from layka.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:45804)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <lgcoelho@HIDDEN>) id 1t3avg-0002TW-NF
for 73962 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 08:57:37 -0400
Received: from mail01.disroot.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E1E22532C
for <73962 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 14:57:04 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org
Received: from layka.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP
id g1ednFHx-kCt for <73962 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>;
Wed, 23 Oct 2024 14:57:03 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail;
t=1729688223; bh=nMFDaZLXc3qFN/hc/9Oa+mODjVEoOdGOQofmjTezg6c=;
h=Date:From:To:Subject;
b=i1WKfi3FGVLj2i+BYRbQpsxQP6llPClibsco/eo43RgkaBj1xpXctGHo4c2aP1lkl
u8gFoQ6bkKhv1r8pv3eGDGPm8r/Q6Xw11j7tUfB6IrxsAv3OPZSh/F1ln7iXku++W+
fCNzT8WtPuGnji0fuofSHknteczUVe+M43pMsWfqVZsJD7Z+4mQQ2bk0rqVOpk+BZH
rsfK/oKtqzNCo7YLzIL6fblktEW6PCbd4xTJClU2SsWpUbHRh+jnOi3/KAdIhQ4j1f
/ZjbOt7FnMkHILy7yBaXC8amGayCJJfvlnlwpquz8MOgCZkdKCAk7vyA6PxAQSBFJW
dCz2+DuJJb4Cg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 14:57:03 +0200
From: lgcoelho@HIDDEN
To: 73962 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: More info regarding the issue
Message-ID: <1146f3d87caa6c63921b9ce58b308c6b@HIDDEN>
X-Sender: lgcoelho@HIDDEN
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=_8f79d7a16b943ea2535a3aae923c7832"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 73962
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
--=_8f79d7a16b943ea2535a3aae923c7832
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
format=flowed
Still on the same matter, while some packages indeed have the same
closure e.g.
_--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---_
+radio at buer in ~ > guix size
/gnu/store/56aq6sdx35f7rsxq8jq9ypafk0dhd3p3-bzip2-1.0.8
store item total
self
/gnu/store/zvlp3n8iwa1svxmwv4q22pv1pb1c9pjq-glibc-2.39 40.5
38.8 50.5%
/gnu/store/zzpbp6rr43smwxzvzd4qd317z5j7qblj-gcc-11.4.0-lib 75.6
35.0 45.5%
/gnu/store/87z5k84hxbqs87plgwsl2v6a4j7m3k7h-bash-static-5.1.16 1.7
1.7 2.2%
/gnu/store/3jhfhxdf6v5ms10x5zmnl166dh3yhbr1-bash-minimal-5.1.16 41.5
1.0 1.3%
/gnu/store/56aq6sdx35f7rsxq8jq9ypafk0dhd3p3-bzip2-1.0.8 77.0
0.4 0.5%
total: 77.0 MiB
+radio at buer in ~ > guix size
/gnu/store/59kd6jyvrq8prl9mbnh3g8d22rc1dbwv-bzip2-1.0.8
store item total
self
/gnu/store/zvlp3n8iwa1svxmwv4q22pv1pb1c9pjq-glibc-2.39 40.5
38.8 50.5%
/gnu/store/zzpbp6rr43smwxzvzd4qd317z5j7qblj-gcc-11.4.0-lib 75.6
35.0 45.5%
/gnu/store/87z5k84hxbqs87plgwsl2v6a4j7m3k7h-bash-static-5.1.16 1.7
1.7 2.2%
/gnu/store/3jhfhxdf6v5ms10x5zmnl166dh3yhbr1-bash-minimal-5.1.16 41.5
1.0 1.3%
/gnu/store/59kd6jyvrq8prl9mbnh3g8d22rc1dbwv-bzip2-1.0.8 76.9
0.4 0.5%
total: 76.9 MiB
+radio at buer in ~ > diff -r
/gnu/store/59kd6jyvrq8prl9mbnh3g8d22rc1dbwv-bzip2-1.0.8
/gnu/store/56aq6sdx35f7rsxq8jq9ypafk0dhd3p3-bzip2-1.0.8
Only in
/gnu/store/56aq6sdx35f7rsxq8jq9ypafk0dhd3p3-bzip2-1.0.8/share/man/man1:
bzcmp.1.gz
Only in
/gnu/store/59kd6jyvrq8prl9mbnh3g8d22rc1dbwv-bzip2-1.0.8/share/man/man1:
bzcmp.1.zst
Only in
/gnu/store/56aq6sdx35f7rsxq8jq9ypafk0dhd3p3-bzip2-1.0.8/share/man/man1:
bzdiff.1.gz
Only in
/gnu/store/59kd6jyvrq8prl9mbnh3g8d22rc1dbwv-bzip2-1.0.8/share/man/man1:
bzdiff.1.zst
Only in
/gnu/store/56aq6sdx35f7rsxq8jq9ypafk0dhd3p3-bzip2-1.0.8/share/man/man1:
bzegrep.1.gz
Only in
/gnu/store/59kd6jyvrq8prl9mbnh3g8d22rc1dbwv-bzip2-1.0.8/share/man/man1:
bzegrep.1.zst
Only in
/gnu/store/56aq6sdx35f7rsxq8jq9ypafk0dhd3p3-bzip2-1.0.8/share/man/man1:
bzfgrep.1.gz
Only in
/gnu/store/59kd6jyvrq8prl9mbnh3g8d22rc1dbwv-bzip2-1.0.8/share/man/man1:
bzfgrep.1.zst
Only in
/gnu/store/56aq6sdx35f7rsxq8jq9ypafk0dhd3p3-bzip2-1.0.8/share/man/man1:
bzgrep.1.gz
Only in
/gnu/store/59kd6jyvrq8prl9mbnh3g8d22rc1dbwv-bzip2-1.0.8/share/man/man1:
bzgrep.1.zst
Only in
/gnu/store/56aq6sdx35f7rsxq8jq9ypafk0dhd3p3-bzip2-1.0.8/share/man/man1:
bzip2.1.gz
Only in
/gnu/store/59kd6jyvrq8prl9mbnh3g8d22rc1dbwv-bzip2-1.0.8/share/man/man1:
bzip2.1.zst
Only in
/gnu/store/56aq6sdx35f7rsxq8jq9ypafk0dhd3p3-bzip2-1.0.8/share/man/man1:
bzless.1.gz
Only in
/gnu/store/59kd6jyvrq8prl9mbnh3g8d22rc1dbwv-bzip2-1.0.8/share/man/man1:
bzless.1.zst
Only in
/gnu/store/56aq6sdx35f7rsxq8jq9ypafk0dhd3p3-bzip2-1.0.8/share/man/man1:
bzmore.1.gz
Only in
/gnu/store/59kd6jyvrq8prl9mbnh3g8d22rc1dbwv-bzip2-1.0.8/share/man/man1:
bzmore.1.zst
_--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---_
many others that have different closures e.g.
_--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---_
+radio at buer in ~ > guix size
/gnu/store/3jhfhxdf6v5ms10x5zmnl166dh3yhbr1-bash-minimal-5.1.16
store item total
self
/gnu/store/zvlp3n8iwa1svxmwv4q22pv1pb1c9pjq-glibc-2.39 40.5
38.8 93.5%
/gnu/store/87z5k84hxbqs87plgwsl2v6a4j7m3k7h-bash-static-5.1.16 1.7
1.7 4.1%
/gnu/store/3jhfhxdf6v5ms10x5zmnl166dh3yhbr1-bash-minimal-5.1.16 41.5
1.0 2.4%
total: 41.5 MiB
+radio at buer in ~ > guix size
/gnu/store/x47i4yafqxdav838aykda9c2hhhn9sa4-bash-minimal-5.1.16
store item total
self
/gnu/store/zvlp3n8iwa1svxmwv4q22pv1pb1c9pjq-glibc-2.39 40.5
38.8 50.7%
/gnu/store/zzpbp6rr43smwxzvzd4qd317z5j7qblj-gcc-11.4.0-lib 75.6
35.0 45.8%
/gnu/store/87z5k84hxbqs87plgwsl2v6a4j7m3k7h-bash-static-5.1.16 1.7
1.7 2.2%
/gnu/store/x47i4yafqxdav838aykda9c2hhhn9sa4-bash-minimal-5.1.16 76.5
1.0 1.3%
total: 76.5 MiB
_--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---_
which is more reasonable to justify the difference in the package
derivation output contents. But still, where does that dependency on
gcc-lib comes from? And if one of them is a "more complete" version of
the other, Why are both packages installed into the profile?
Thanks in advance,
Luis Guilherme Coelho
--=_8f79d7a16b943ea2535a3aae923c7832
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=
=3DUTF-8" /></head><body style=3D'font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana,Gen=
eva,sans-serif'>
<p>Still on the same matter, while some packages indeed have the same closu=
re e.g.</p>
<pre style=3D"color: #e8e6e3;" data-darkreader-inline-color=3D""><em>--8<=
;---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---</em></pre>
<pre style=3D"color: #e8e6e3;" data-darkreader-inline-color=3D"">+radio at =
buer in ~ > guix size /gnu/store/56aq6sdx35f7rsxq8jq9ypafk0dhd3p3-bzip2-=
1.0.8<br />store item &nbs=
p; &n=
bsp; total &=
nbsp;self<br />/gnu/store/zvlp3n8iwa1svxmwv4q22pv1pb1c9pjq-glibc-2.39  =
; 40.5 38.8 50.=
5%<br />/gnu/store/zzpbp6rr43smwxzvzd4qd317z5j7qblj-gcc-11.4.0-lib &=
nbsp; 75.6 35.0 45.5%<br />/gnu/stor=
e/87z5k84hxbqs87plgwsl2v6a4j7m3k7h-bash-static-5.1.16 =
1.7 1.7 2.2%<br />/gnu/store/3jhfhxdf6v5ms10x5zmnl166d=
h3yhbr1-bash-minimal-5.1.16 41.5 1.0 1.3=
%<br />/gnu/store/56aq6sdx35f7rsxq8jq9ypafk0dhd3p3-bzip2-1.0.8  =
; 77.0 0.4 0.5%<br />total=
: 77.0 MiB<br />+radio at buer in ~ > guix size /gnu/store/59kd6jyvrq8pr=
l9mbnh3g8d22rc1dbwv-bzip2-1.0.8<br />store item =
&nbs=
p; &n=
bsp; total self<br />/gnu/store/zvlp3n8iwa1svxmwv4q22pv=
1pb1c9pjq-glibc-2.39 40.5 &=
nbsp; 38.8 50.5%<br />/gnu/store/zzpbp6rr43smwxzvzd4qd317z5j7qb=
lj-gcc-11.4.0-lib 75.6 35.0 =
45.5%<br />/gnu/store/87z5k84hxbqs87plgwsl2v6a4j7m3k7h-bash-static-5.=
1.16 1.7 1.7 2.2%<br />/gnu/store=
/3jhfhxdf6v5ms10x5zmnl166dh3yhbr1-bash-minimal-5.1.16 41.5 &n=
bsp; 1.0 1.3%<br />/gnu/store/59kd6jyvrq8prl9mbnh3g8d22rc1dbw=
v-bzip2-1.0.8 76.9 =
0.4 0.5%<br />total: 76.9 MiB<br />+radio at buer in ~ > diff -r =
/gnu/store/59kd6jyvrq8prl9mbnh3g8d22rc1dbwv-bzip2-1.0.8 /gnu/store/56aq6sdx=
35f7rsxq8jq9ypafk0dhd3p3-bzip2-1.0.8<br />Only in /gnu/store/56aq6sdx35f7rs=
xq8jq9ypafk0dhd3p3-bzip2-1.0.8/share/man/man1: bzcmp.1.gz<br />Only in /gnu=
/store/59kd6jyvrq8prl9mbnh3g8d22rc1dbwv-bzip2-1.0.8/share/man/man1: bzcmp.1=
=2Ezst<br />Only in /gnu/store/56aq6sdx35f7rsxq8jq9ypafk0dhd3p3-bzip2-1.0.8=
/share/man/man1: bzdiff.1.gz<br />Only in /gnu/store/59kd6jyvrq8prl9mbnh3g8=
d22rc1dbwv-bzip2-1.0.8/share/man/man1: bzdiff.1.zst<br />Only in /gnu/store=
/56aq6sdx35f7rsxq8jq9ypafk0dhd3p3-bzip2-1.0.8/share/man/man1: bzegrep.1.gz<=
br />Only in /gnu/store/59kd6jyvrq8prl9mbnh3g8d22rc1dbwv-bzip2-1.0.8/share/=
man/man1: bzegrep.1.zst<br />Only in /gnu/store/56aq6sdx35f7rsxq8jq9ypafk0d=
hd3p3-bzip2-1.0.8/share/man/man1: bzfgrep.1.gz<br />Only in /gnu/store/59kd=
6jyvrq8prl9mbnh3g8d22rc1dbwv-bzip2-1.0.8/share/man/man1: bzfgrep.1.zst<br /=
>Only in /gnu/store/56aq6sdx35f7rsxq8jq9ypafk0dhd3p3-bzip2-1.0.8/share/man/=
man1: bzgrep.1.gz<br />Only in /gnu/store/59kd6jyvrq8prl9mbnh3g8d22rc1dbwv-=
bzip2-1.0.8/share/man/man1: bzgrep.1.zst<br />Only in /gnu/store/56aq6sdx35=
f7rsxq8jq9ypafk0dhd3p3-bzip2-1.0.8/share/man/man1: bzip2.1.gz<br />Only in =
/gnu/store/59kd6jyvrq8prl9mbnh3g8d22rc1dbwv-bzip2-1.0.8/share/man/man1: bzi=
p2.1.zst<br />Only in /gnu/store/56aq6sdx35f7rsxq8jq9ypafk0dhd3p3-bzip2-1.0=
=2E8/share/man/man1: bzless.1.gz<br />Only in /gnu/store/59kd6jyvrq8prl9mbn=
h3g8d22rc1dbwv-bzip2-1.0.8/share/man/man1: bzless.1.zst<br />Only in /gnu/s=
tore/56aq6sdx35f7rsxq8jq9ypafk0dhd3p3-bzip2-1.0.8/share/man/man1: bzmore.1.=
gz<br />Only in /gnu/store/59kd6jyvrq8prl9mbnh3g8d22rc1dbwv-bzip2-1.0.8/sha=
re/man/man1: bzmore.1.zst</pre>
<pre style=3D"color: #e8e6e3;" data-darkreader-inline-color=3D""><em>--8<=
;---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---</em>
</pre>
<pre style=3D"color: #e8e6e3;" data-darkreader-inline-color=3D""><br />many=
others that have different closures e.g.</pre>
<p><span style=3D"font-family: 'andale mono', monospace;"><em>--8<------=
---------cut here---------------start------------->8---</em></span></p>
<pre style=3D"color: #e8e6e3;" data-darkreader-inline-color=3D"">+radio at =
buer in ~ > guix size /gnu/store/3jhfhxdf6v5ms10x5zmnl166dh3yhbr1-bash-m=
inimal-5.1.16<br />store item &nb=
sp; &=
nbsp; total =
self<br />/gnu/store/zvlp3n8iwa1svxmwv4q22pv1pb1c9pjq-glibc-2.=
39 40.5 38.8 &=
nbsp;93.5%<br />/gnu/store/87z5k84hxbqs87plgwsl2v6a4j7m3k7h-bash-static-5.1=
=2E16 1.7 1.7 4.1%<br />/gnu/stor=
e/3jhfhxdf6v5ms10x5zmnl166dh3yhbr1-bash-minimal-5.1.16 41.5 &=
nbsp; 1.0 2.4%<br />total: 41.5 MiB<br />+radio at buer in ~ =
> guix size /gnu/store/x47i4yafqxdav838aykda9c2hhhn9sa4-bash-minimal-5.1=
=2E16<br />store item &nbs=
p; &n=
bsp; total &=
nbsp;self<br />/gnu/store/zvlp3n8iwa1svxmwv4q22pv1pb1c9pjq-glibc-2.39  =
; 40.5 38.8 50.=
7%<br />/gnu/store/zzpbp6rr43smwxzvzd4qd317z5j7qblj-gcc-11.4.0-lib &=
nbsp; 75.6 35.0 45.8%<br />/gnu/stor=
e/87z5k84hxbqs87plgwsl2v6a4j7m3k7h-bash-static-5.1.16 =
1.7 1.7 2.2%<br />/gnu/store/x47i4yafqxdav838aykda9c2h=
hhn9sa4-bash-minimal-5.1.16 76.5 1.0 1.3=
%<br />total: 76.5 MiB</pre>
<p><span style=3D"font-family: 'andale mono', monospace;"><em>--8<------=
---------cut here---------------end--------------->8---</em> </span=
></p>
<pre style=3D"color: #e8e6e3;" data-darkreader-inline-color=3D"">which is m=
ore reasonable to justify the difference in the package derivation output c=
ontents. But still, where does that dependency on gcc-lib comes from? And i=
f one of them is a "more complete" version of the other, Why are both packa=
ges installed into the profile?</pre>
<p><br />Thanks in advance,<br />Luis Guilherme Coelho</p>
</body></html>
--=_8f79d7a16b943ea2535a3aae923c7832--
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#73962; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Oct 2024 11:42:54 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 23 07:42:54 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58822 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1t3ZlN-0007cT-Pc for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 07:42:54 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:40256) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <lgcoelho@HIDDEN>) id 1t3ZlM-0007cK-2V for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 07:42:52 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <lgcoelho@HIDDEN>) id 1t3Zki-0001eP-0C for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 07:42:15 -0400 Received: from layka.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <lgcoelho@HIDDEN>) id 1t3Zkd-0004I8-4w for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 07:42:09 -0400 Received: from mail01.disroot.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 214AF25258 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 13:42:03 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Received: from layka.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id RIsZgCXbACrO for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 13:42:02 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1729683722; bh=1ApPNmgZOG4k2xw0hyoT2t5ZFX626Sms8P85Nc62lq8=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=V8wzutg5GBWwvSKkv8WyDJIr3QAmMnHlp2UfpEvJ7qQGf2goIFCcYv2qwy9pwtaY4 l3t7sCwfg/XS89gJKstSCGodtq2Qejed+xjLirKPsOeuj1Zfi2aY0ycgjoj1y1w/mi ZcUmwc8YOlLj+q9I0GDJwznDTMjFAqwKydygaG7YuPNtMchhJcrOsDRXp3hUtSVYrL K/K4mEXIPEcwRSj9Q+/QF24D8sYPnZw/LfnNCjMCjvxX87ag7ycZpVxat7Yoe2hMd1 zwT1XG2rfN3IFGvX/ckBgA9gqS/KHbo4ORJmRtsHWufyYdeWiADd1zlLQ/gaq7FLP9 WFCBIZMSYeWdw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 13:42:02 +0200 From: lgcoelho@HIDDEN To: bug-guix@HIDDEN Subject: Seemingly unecessary package duplication in home and system profiles Message-ID: <3e5e77af52333a8d09ea63c5bb4515d4@HIDDEN> X-Sender: lgcoelho@HIDDEN Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_2012bda7e885cd44e0f65816d22aa05e" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=178.21.23.139; envelope-from=lgcoelho@HIDDEN; helo=layka.disroot.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) --=_2012bda7e885cd44e0f65816d22aa05e Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed When running either `guix size $(realpath ~/.guix-home/profile)` or `guix size $(realpath /run/current-system/profile)` on my system, I could see that multiple packages have "duplicates", whose hash doesn't match. After investigation, I discovered that for all the ones I've checked, the hash differs simply because compression used for some files in the derivation output (such as manpages, for example). Some examples are: bash-minimal-5.1.16 bzip2-1.0.8 cairo-1.18.0 coreutils-9.1 dbus-1.15.8 extension.json ffmpeg-6.1.1 gawk-5.3.0 gcc-11.4.0-lib git-2.46.0 glib-2.78.0 grep-3.11 gtk+-2.24.33 gtk+-3.24.41 gtk+-3.24.41-bin gzip-1.13 harfbuzz-8.3.0 libffi-3.4.4 libnotify-0.8.3 librsvg-2.56.4 libxkbcommon-1.6.0 mesa-24.0.4 python-3.10.7 python-3.10.7-tk python-pyparsing-3.0.6 qtwayland-5.15.10 tar-1.34 wayland-1.22.0 xz-5.4.5 zlib-1.3 Running guix challenge over these packages also doesn't detect any kind of reproducibility issues. Is there any reason for the package duplication? Thanks in advance, Luis Guilherme Coelho --=_2012bda7e885cd44e0f65816d22aa05e Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 <html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset= =3DUTF-8" /></head><body style=3D'font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana,Gen= eva,sans-serif'> <p>When running either `guix size $(realpath ~/.guix-home/profile)` or `gui= x size $(realpath /run/current-system/profile)` on my system, I could see t= hat multiple packages have "duplicates", whose hash doesn't match. After in= vestigation, I discovered that for all the ones I've checked, the hash diff= ers simply because compression used for some files in the derivation output= (such as manpages, for example). Some examples are:<br /><br />bash-minima= l-5.1.16<br />bzip2-1.0.8<br />cairo-1.18.0<br />coreutils-9.1<br />dbus-1.= 15.8<br />extension.json<br />ffmpeg-6.1.1<br />gawk-5.3.0<br />gcc-11.4.0-= lib<br />git-2.46.0<br />glib-2.78.0<br />grep-3.11<br />gtk+-2.24.33<br />= gtk+-3.24.41<br />gtk+-3.24.41-bin<br />gzip-1.13<br />harfbuzz-8.3.0<br />= libffi-3.4.4<br />libnotify-0.8.3<br />librsvg-2.56.4<br />libxkbcommon-1.6= =2E0<br />mesa-24.0.4<br />python-3.10.7<br />python-3.10.7-tk<br />python-= pyparsing-3.0.6<br />qtwayland-5.15.10<br />tar-1.34<br />wayland-1.22.0<br= />xz-5.4.5<br />zlib-1.3<br /><br />Running guix challenge over these pack= ages also doesn't detect any kind of reproducibility issues. Is there any r= eason for the package duplication?<br /><br />Thanks in advance,<br />Luis = Guilherme Coelho</p> </body></html> --=_2012bda7e885cd44e0f65816d22aa05e--
lgcoelho@HIDDEN:bug-guix@HIDDEN.
Full text available.bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#73962; Package guix.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.