GNU logs - #75298, boring messages

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#75298: GUD doesn't let me answer debuginfod query
Resent-From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 19:06:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.75298.B.17358447106561 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.8; emacs 31.0.50
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 14:04:56 -0500
Message-ID: <87o70p2g13.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2600:3c01:e000:3d8::1;
 envelope-from=dancol@HIDDEN; helo=dancol.org
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/)

I'd expect to be able to answer the debuginfod query in the affirmative
in the GUD session below, but nothing I put into the buffer seems
acceptable to GDB.

Current directory is /home/dancol/edev/debug/
GNU gdb (Ubuntu 15.1-1ubuntu2) 15.1
Copyright (C) 2024 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-linux-gnu".
Type "show configuration" for configuration details.
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
<https://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>.
Find the GDB manual and other documentation resources online at:
    <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/documentation/>.

For help, type "help".
Type "apropos word" to search for commands related to "word"...
Reading symbols from /home/dancol/.cache/rr/emacs-5/mmap_clone_5_emacs...
Really redefine built-in command "restart"? (y or n) [answered Y; input not from terminal]
Really redefine built-in command "jump"? (y or n) [answered Y; input not from terminal]
Remote debugging using 127.0.0.1:31571
Reading symbols from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2...
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/b3/3a9ce38781b940e741fd85448861a71ff2297b.debug...
warning: BFD: warning: system-supplied DSO at 0x6fffd000 has a section extending past end of file

This GDB supports auto-downloading debuginfo from the following URLs:
  <https://debuginfod.ubuntu.com>
Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) Please answer y or [n].
Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) Please answer y or [n].
Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) Please answer y or [n].
Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) Please answer y or [n].
Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) Please answer y or [n].
Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) Please answer y or [n].
Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) Please answer y or [n].
Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) Please answer y or [n].
Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) Please answer y or [n].
Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) Please answer y or [n].
Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) Please answer y or [n].
Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) Please answer y or [n].
Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) Please answer y or [n].
Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) Please answer y or [n].
Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) y
Please answer y or [n].
Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) y
Please answer y or [n].
Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) [y]
Please answer y or [n].
Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) y
Please answer y or [n].
Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) yes
Please answer y or [n].
Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) y
Please answer y or [n].
Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) y
Please answer y or [n].
Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) y
Please answer y or [n].
Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) Y
Please answer y or [n].
Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) eat flaming death
Please answer y or [n].
Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n])

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Daniel Colascione <dancol@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#75298: Acknowledgement (GUD doesn't let me answer debuginfod
 query)
Message-ID: <handler.75298.B.17358447106561.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <87o70p2g13.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 75298
X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs
Reply-To: 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 19:06:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
75298: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D75298
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#75298: GUD doesn't let me answer debuginfod query
Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 20:10:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.75298.B75298.173584858920938 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Daniel Colascione <dancol@HIDDEN>
Cc: 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 22:09:22 +0200
Message-Id: <86seq1htal.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87o70p2g13.fsf@HIDDEN> (message from Daniel Colascione on
 Thu, 02 Jan 2025 14:04:56 -0500)
References: <87o70p2g13.fsf@HIDDEN>
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

> From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@HIDDEN>
> Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 14:04:56 -0500
> 
> I'd expect to be able to answer the debuginfod query in the affirmative
> in the GUD session below, but nothing I put into the buffer seems
> acceptable to GDB.

Which command did you use: "M-x gdb" or "M-x gud-gdb"?

The former is supposed to allow you to answer the question, at least
in Emacs 30 (you didn't say which Emacs version you used).  The latter
doesn't ask me that question at all.  So I'm unsure what happens in
your case.  In case this is GDB-version dependent: I tried with GDB
version 12.1.

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#75298: GUD doesn't let me answer debuginfod query
Resent-From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 22:29:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.75298.B75298.173585693618360 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Cc: 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <86seq1htal.fsf@HIDDEN> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 02 Jan
 2025 22:09:22 +0200")
References: <87o70p2g13.fsf@HIDDEN> <86seq1htal.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.8; emacs 31.0.50
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 17:28:51 -0500
Message-ID: <8734i0c0kc.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes:

>> From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@HIDDEN>
>> Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 14:04:56 -0500
>> 
>> I'd expect to be able to answer the debuginfod query in the affirmative
>> in the GUD session below, but nothing I put into the buffer seems
>> acceptable to GDB.
>
> Which command did you use: "M-x gdb" or "M-x gud-gdb"?

The former.  The latter works fine, but doesn't integrate into Emacs.

> The former is supposed to allow you to answer the question, at least
> in Emacs 30 (you didn't say which Emacs version you used).

I'm using master.

> The latter
> doesn't ask me that question at all.  So I'm unsure what happens in
> your case.  In case this is GDB-version dependent: I tried with GDB
> version 12.1.

debuginfod isn't enabled in all environments, so you might not get the question.
I'm using GDB 15.1.

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#75298: GUD doesn't let me answer debuginfod query
Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2025 08:11:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.75298.B75298.17358918392494 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 75298
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Daniel Colascione <dancol@HIDDEN>
Cc: 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 75298-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B75298.17358918392494
          (code B ref 75298); Fri, 03 Jan 2025 08:11:02 +0000
Received: (at 75298) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jan 2025 08:10:39 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49383 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tTclS-0000eA-CP
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2025 03:10:38 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34582)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1tTclL-0000ds-Mi
 for 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2025 03:10:37 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>)
 id 1tTclF-0005Uj-L2; Fri, 03 Jan 2025 03:10:25 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=7cBLRqjW37TEkZAcpLxqrV+5LGp1qavl6kn6FRjmOhk=; b=J/VoNIRZQIYn
 0DSSE2XoC2aooyaPVTEePIBFX6c+eznJg6QA9VEzyXyZobfb4MkULr26BAdM6tflYsD0aXWp4P2tN
 wtW4JhOYpeE/JaCxqsgVyBB2md9L7B6Tv22DPdVJDH57xcj2jTaJoFqfEDv8a44RxRRcKBVV6BXiW
 o6nqPNa1G5X1pco7Qri7ZHemlXcrlPR7+beC5p9BWBPRcZuHa/q9dVZDpIYBWUX1UYoESu+hutuaN
 73jpcW3uwCvTDMNWKKLvZgfrPE7GEt6+t8MmtK0ZWDBTlUUJh4k0kc+FZmE2p2+g8nLXs70QQQAny
 /xcGvewYFDwJ0/4qVoIViw==;
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2025 10:09:51 +0200
Message-Id: <865xmwiai8.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <8734i0c0kc.fsf@HIDDEN> (message from Daniel Colascione on
 Thu, 02 Jan 2025 17:28:51 -0500)
References: <87o70p2g13.fsf@HIDDEN> <86seq1htal.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <8734i0c0kc.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

> From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@HIDDEN>
> Cc: 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 17:28:51 -0500
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes:
> 
> >> From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@HIDDEN>
> >> Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 14:04:56 -0500
> >> 
> >> I'd expect to be able to answer the debuginfod query in the affirmative
> >> in the GUD session below, but nothing I put into the buffer seems
> >> acceptable to GDB.
> >
> > Which command did you use: "M-x gdb" or "M-x gud-gdb"?
> 
> The former.  The latter works fine, but doesn't integrate into Emacs.
> 
> > The former is supposed to allow you to answer the question, at least
> > in Emacs 30 (you didn't say which Emacs version you used).
> 
> I'm using master.

Then I cannot reproduce this here.

> > The latter doesn't ask me that question at all.  So I'm unsure
> > what happens in your case.  In case this is GDB-version dependent:
> > I tried with GDB version 12.1.
> 
> debuginfod isn't enabled in all environments, so you might not get
> the question.  I'm using GDB 15.1.

Oh, I do get asked, and I can answer either 'n' or 'y'.  But the
question I see is worded differently:

  Enable querying debuginfod servers for this session? (y or n) y

This question comes from gdb-init-1, in this fragment:

  ;; This needs to be done before we ask GDB for anything that might
  ;; trigger questions about debuginfod queries.
  (if (eq gdb-debuginfod-enable 'ask)
      (setq gdb-debuginfod-enable
            (y-or-n-p "Enable querying debuginfod servers for this session?")))
  (gdb-input (format "-gdb-set debuginfod enabled %s"
                     (if gdb-debuginfod-enable "on" "off"))
             'gdb-debuginfod-message)

It looks like in your case we fail to ask the above question before
GDB asks us about that, but what breaks the above assumption and
triggers GDB's question before we shut it up?  It could be a different
GDB version, I'm not sure.  I don't have GDB 15 on the GNU/Linux
system where I can test this.

Is this in "emacs -Q", btw?  If not, perhaps some customizations get
in the way?  Or maybe some GDB customizations?

Can anyone else reproduce this with the master branch and GDB 15?

Anyway, as a stopgap, you should be able to avoid the question by
customizing gdb-debuginfod-enable-setting.  If that doesn't work
either, it's possible that something causes GDB to ask this question
earlier than we anticipate, and we need to revisit this code (which
was tested at the time with GDB versions that asked about debuginfod).

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#75298: GUD doesn't let me answer debuginfod query
Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 09:16:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.75298.B75298.17371917453158 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 75298
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: dancol@HIDDEN
Cc: 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 75298-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B75298.17371917453158
          (code B ref 75298); Sat, 18 Jan 2025 09:16:01 +0000
Received: (at 75298) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jan 2025 09:15:45 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40134 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tZ4vg-0000os-W7
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2025 04:15:45 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52430)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1tZ4ve-0000oc-Cx
 for 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2025 04:15:43 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>)
 id 1tZ4vT-0001oP-UQ; Sat, 18 Jan 2025 04:15:36 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=wU42+q8XoufSUYGC+6cnO6atKB2JQJjt3pEJ5A9RRi4=; b=jKKpBGxfiW0B
 vroeB1qWPMaqG/vpuvM32gWrhSLSKjIsd2oHAi1EzUwk1SinDXShltbF1KDA8mziQ8gQ9gtEhd/2b
 tEDR6WpHqUzZCtmlP1DH9cKkPo8hVxm6RYw13EudsaM1+msWWZmzqVkh2T6/kDaeisUZoJzNGe+0P
 R5A0HwHIDenPboYm3xwukzH5tP9Tmi3c7Qw4mcGsEjq+cmz9eX9lBJAy0wiYzn0rs6B6uUyh3dfKB
 s4/loJptC1JL7H2uJaV3+yqom9qUJY6O5sFWwbkJlGPwEXjd1yVoqtnbhSbyAUpNWavsdkosc42oQ
 jTXcohY9sjnXCQ34HWe3NQ==;
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 11:15:29 +0200
Message-Id: <868qr8cwjy.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <865xmwiai8.fsf@HIDDEN> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Fri, 03
 Jan 2025 10:09:51 +0200)
References: <87o70p2g13.fsf@HIDDEN> <86seq1htal.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <8734i0c0kc.fsf@HIDDEN> <865xmwiai8.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Ping!  Any additional information about this?  I'd like to make some
progress with this issue, at least to understand what is causing it
and why can't I reproduce this on my system.

> Cc: 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2025 10:09:51 +0200
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
> 
> > From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@HIDDEN>
> > Cc: 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> > Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 17:28:51 -0500
> > 
> > Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes:
> > 
> > >> From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@HIDDEN>
> > >> Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 14:04:56 -0500
> > >> 
> > >> I'd expect to be able to answer the debuginfod query in the affirmative
> > >> in the GUD session below, but nothing I put into the buffer seems
> > >> acceptable to GDB.
> > >
> > > Which command did you use: "M-x gdb" or "M-x gud-gdb"?
> > 
> > The former.  The latter works fine, but doesn't integrate into Emacs.
> > 
> > > The former is supposed to allow you to answer the question, at least
> > > in Emacs 30 (you didn't say which Emacs version you used).
> > 
> > I'm using master.
> 
> Then I cannot reproduce this here.
> 
> > > The latter doesn't ask me that question at all.  So I'm unsure
> > > what happens in your case.  In case this is GDB-version dependent:
> > > I tried with GDB version 12.1.
> > 
> > debuginfod isn't enabled in all environments, so you might not get
> > the question.  I'm using GDB 15.1.
> 
> Oh, I do get asked, and I can answer either 'n' or 'y'.  But the
> question I see is worded differently:
> 
>   Enable querying debuginfod servers for this session? (y or n) y
> 
> This question comes from gdb-init-1, in this fragment:
> 
>   ;; This needs to be done before we ask GDB for anything that might
>   ;; trigger questions about debuginfod queries.
>   (if (eq gdb-debuginfod-enable 'ask)
>       (setq gdb-debuginfod-enable
>             (y-or-n-p "Enable querying debuginfod servers for this session?")))
>   (gdb-input (format "-gdb-set debuginfod enabled %s"
>                      (if gdb-debuginfod-enable "on" "off"))
>              'gdb-debuginfod-message)
> 
> It looks like in your case we fail to ask the above question before
> GDB asks us about that, but what breaks the above assumption and
> triggers GDB's question before we shut it up?  It could be a different
> GDB version, I'm not sure.  I don't have GDB 15 on the GNU/Linux
> system where I can test this.
> 
> Is this in "emacs -Q", btw?  If not, perhaps some customizations get
> in the way?  Or maybe some GDB customizations?
> 
> Can anyone else reproduce this with the master branch and GDB 15?
> 
> Anyway, as a stopgap, you should be able to avoid the question by
> customizing gdb-debuginfod-enable-setting.  If that doesn't work
> either, it's possible that something causes GDB to ask this question
> earlier than we anticipate, and we need to revisit this code (which
> was tested at the time with GDB versions that asked about debuginfod).
> 
> 
> 
>

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#75298: GUD doesn't let me answer debuginfod query
Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2025 11:57:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.75298.B75298.173841098621697 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 75298
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: dancol@HIDDEN
Cc: 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 75298-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B75298.173841098621697
          (code B ref 75298); Sat, 01 Feb 2025 11:57:01 +0000
Received: (at 75298) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2025 11:56:26 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56795 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1teC6r-0005ds-QK
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2025 06:56:26 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56388)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1teC6p-0005dc-IS
 for 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2025 06:56:24 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>)
 id 1teC6j-0006uY-2R; Sat, 01 Feb 2025 06:56:17 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=U4dPdjbuwWacDybsyzI2OliUK9ZlKg8qBUaMZzAENuw=; b=JRToOZmp/rHo
 vIr2FY5tet4Md6CFWh3DR7aspzLmItQD4EY4fO4uMh5HDzN+IVuPMBezxIhSX1H1siIwmZuZSSkuA
 sRRbPpRrgrt4h/tBXm0gvvCpzp+TmFQPjZMYcfbEBuCPuH2xhLMP/vOA6dDbxz4LkW+Kv71ZPPN1S
 GMkwPijGgoZvpVKo+i6OSigHpQ025z7CKH1LFlzP0eSoqpMKTh7k0Npkug9WEfU//G7751T4c+HeN
 DxsCgwp3+ieQhrLNUZPK5BUJr/k5xp7+Dd50QP4W7KAq8+/z5wKrKDeKLJyuTBBTYlocHXBH+8i5q
 idUPh5SXOWcoRNxQNb8Ifg==;
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2025 13:56:13 +0200
Message-Id: <86ikptg9pe.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <868qr8cwjy.fsf@HIDDEN> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 18
 Jan 2025 11:15:29 +0200)
References: <87o70p2g13.fsf@HIDDEN> <86seq1htal.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <8734i0c0kc.fsf@HIDDEN> <865xmwiai8.fsf@HIDDEN> <868qr8cwjy.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Ping! Ping!  Daniel, could you please respond?

> Cc: 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 11:15:29 +0200
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
> 
> Ping!  Any additional information about this?  I'd like to make some
> progress with this issue, at least to understand what is causing it
> and why can't I reproduce this on my system.
> 
> > Cc: 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> > Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2025 10:09:51 +0200
> > From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
> > 
> > > From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@HIDDEN>
> > > Cc: 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> > > Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 17:28:51 -0500
> > > 
> > > Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes:
> > > 
> > > >> From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@HIDDEN>
> > > >> Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 14:04:56 -0500
> > > >> 
> > > >> I'd expect to be able to answer the debuginfod query in the affirmative
> > > >> in the GUD session below, but nothing I put into the buffer seems
> > > >> acceptable to GDB.
> > > >
> > > > Which command did you use: "M-x gdb" or "M-x gud-gdb"?
> > > 
> > > The former.  The latter works fine, but doesn't integrate into Emacs.
> > > 
> > > > The former is supposed to allow you to answer the question, at least
> > > > in Emacs 30 (you didn't say which Emacs version you used).
> > > 
> > > I'm using master.
> > 
> > Then I cannot reproduce this here.
> > 
> > > > The latter doesn't ask me that question at all.  So I'm unsure
> > > > what happens in your case.  In case this is GDB-version dependent:
> > > > I tried with GDB version 12.1.
> > > 
> > > debuginfod isn't enabled in all environments, so you might not get
> > > the question.  I'm using GDB 15.1.
> > 
> > Oh, I do get asked, and I can answer either 'n' or 'y'.  But the
> > question I see is worded differently:
> > 
> >   Enable querying debuginfod servers for this session? (y or n) y
> > 
> > This question comes from gdb-init-1, in this fragment:
> > 
> >   ;; This needs to be done before we ask GDB for anything that might
> >   ;; trigger questions about debuginfod queries.
> >   (if (eq gdb-debuginfod-enable 'ask)
> >       (setq gdb-debuginfod-enable
> >             (y-or-n-p "Enable querying debuginfod servers for this session?")))
> >   (gdb-input (format "-gdb-set debuginfod enabled %s"
> >                      (if gdb-debuginfod-enable "on" "off"))
> >              'gdb-debuginfod-message)
> > 
> > It looks like in your case we fail to ask the above question before
> > GDB asks us about that, but what breaks the above assumption and
> > triggers GDB's question before we shut it up?  It could be a different
> > GDB version, I'm not sure.  I don't have GDB 15 on the GNU/Linux
> > system where I can test this.
> > 
> > Is this in "emacs -Q", btw?  If not, perhaps some customizations get
> > in the way?  Or maybe some GDB customizations?
> > 
> > Can anyone else reproduce this with the master branch and GDB 15?
> > 
> > Anyway, as a stopgap, you should be able to avoid the question by
> > customizing gdb-debuginfod-enable-setting.  If that doesn't work
> > either, it's possible that something causes GDB to ask this question
> > earlier than we anticipate, and we need to revisit this code (which
> > was tested at the time with GDB versions that asked about debuginfod).
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
>

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#75298: GUD doesn't let me answer debuginfod query
Resent-From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 15:40:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.75298.B75298.173963397218750 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 75298
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Cc: 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 75298-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B75298.173963397218750
          (code B ref 75298); Sat, 15 Feb 2025 15:40:02 +0000
Received: (at 75298) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Feb 2025 15:39:32 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57422 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1tjKGR-0004sL-QZ
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2025 10:39:32 -0500
Received: from dancol.org ([2600:3c01:e000:3d8::1]:34780)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <dancol@HIDDEN>) id 1tjKGN-0004s9-Ef
 for 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2025 10:39:29 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dancol.org; 
 s=x;
 h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:
 References:In-Reply-To:Subject:CC:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:
 Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc
 :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:
 List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=+0NsatCMpy6SGVQkCviehjjc1Vc4yZqHy/eRamKgtwI=; b=hMCccvHeipFYWIP5JfM94VGzTB
 d8G1ukvMcjPFKQKuCzicFSsedn29Lva7tm0pEDrrr4ZYfpPSG9LJAZjeuu11KR/oED9FCLvhBpL0P
 lZxeCYPRuxFQMI9/xuckoPQB6xxqWCWzBZcb6RJkdE04RUQPeGdoo/nFSCbvOEyQs7wn58ipx5Qd2
 6RvyfrxiL1rzDDHgJL0Qu+oLysnL8crezR+0KhbyNZ+xwt06QMyprBrigmeE1Z5usher8E5xiUIIz
 pm73e4QjaBzc2CaNCxazSd+aOomgAaA92HhUR9mcLCmdJr+c+8YNfuKQ0T+rWLr3mngdz2BHJBBbs
 GtxXfMAg==;
Received: from [2600:1010:b019:b37d:0:28:5816:1601] (port=42932
 helo=[IPv6:::1])
 by dancol.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <dancol@HIDDEN>) id 1tjKGL-0003wH-1T;
 Sat, 15 Feb 2025 10:39:25 -0500
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 07:39:17 -0800
From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <86ikptg9pe.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <87o70p2g13.fsf@HIDDEN> <86seq1htal.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <8734i0c0kc.fsf@HIDDEN> <865xmwiai8.fsf@HIDDEN> <868qr8cwjy.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <86ikptg9pe.fsf@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <63ED3ABA-78E5-4605-89E3-ADDDF9300DB0@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)



On February 1, 2025 3:56:13 AM PST, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu=2Eorg> wrote:
>Ping! Ping!  Daniel, could you please respond?
>
>> Cc: 75298@debbugs=2Egnu=2Eorg
>> Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 11:15:29 +0200
>> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu=2Eorg>
>>=20
>> Ping!  Any additional information about this?  I'd like to make some
>> progress with this issue, at least to understand what is causing it
>> and why can't I reproduce this on my system=2E
>>=20
>> > Cc: 75298@debbugs=2Egnu=2Eorg
>> > Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2025 10:09:51 +0200
>> > From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu=2Eorg>
>> >=20
>> > > From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol=2Eorg>
>> > > Cc: 75298@debbugs=2Egnu=2Eorg
>> > > Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 17:28:51 -0500
>> > >=20
>> > > Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu=2Eorg> writes:
>> > >=20
>> > > >> From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol=2Eorg>
>> > > >> Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 14:04:56 -0500
>> > > >>=20
>> > > >> I'd expect to be able to answer the debuginfod query in the affi=
rmative
>> > > >> in the GUD session below, but nothing I put into the buffer seem=
s
>> > > >> acceptable to GDB=2E
>> > > >
>> > > > Which command did you use: "M-x gdb" or "M-x gud-gdb"?
>> > >=20
>> > > The former=2E  The latter works fine, but doesn't integrate into Em=
acs=2E
>> > >=20
>> > > > The former is supposed to allow you to answer the question, at le=
ast
>> > > > in Emacs 30 (you didn't say which Emacs version you used)=2E
>> > >=20
>> > > I'm using master=2E
>> >=20
>> > Then I cannot reproduce this here=2E
>> >=20
>> > > > The latter doesn't ask me that question at all=2E  So I'm unsure
>> > > > what happens in your case=2E  In case this is GDB-version depende=
nt:
>> > > > I tried with GDB version 12=2E1=2E
>> > >=20
>> > > debuginfod isn't enabled in all environments, so you might not get
>> > > the question=2E  I'm using GDB 15=2E1=2E
>> >=20
>> > Oh, I do get asked, and I can answer either 'n' or 'y'=2E  But the
>> > question I see is worded differently:
>> >=20
>> >   Enable querying debuginfod servers for this session? (y or n) y
>> >=20
>> > This question comes from gdb-init-1, in this fragment:
>> >=20
>> >   ;; This needs to be done before we ask GDB for anything that might
>> >   ;; trigger questions about debuginfod queries=2E
>> >   (if (eq gdb-debuginfod-enable 'ask)
>> >       (setq gdb-debuginfod-enable
>> >             (y-or-n-p "Enable querying debuginfod servers for this se=
ssion?")))
>> >   (gdb-input (format "-gdb-set debuginfod enabled %s"
>> >                      (if gdb-debuginfod-enable "on" "off"))
>> >              'gdb-debuginfod-message)
>> >=20
>> > It looks like in your case we fail to ask the above question before
>> > GDB asks us about that, but what breaks the above assumption and
>> > triggers GDB's question before we shut it up?  It could be a differen=
t
>> > GDB version, I'm not sure=2E  I don't have GDB 15 on the GNU/Linux
>> > system where I can test this=2E
>> >=20
>> > Is this in "emacs -Q", btw?  If not, perhaps some customizations get
>> > in the way?  Or maybe some GDB customizations?
>> >=20
>> > Can anyone else reproduce this with the master branch and GDB 15?
>> >=20
>> > Anyway, as a stopgap, you should be able to avoid the question by
>> > customizing gdb-debuginfod-enable-setting=2E  If that doesn't work
>> > either, it's possible that something causes GDB to ask this question
>> > earlier than we anticipate, and we need to revisit this code (which
>> > was tested at the time with GDB versions that asked about debuginfod)=
=2E

Haven't had a chance to experiment with GUD again recently

Last modified: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 15:45:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.