Received: (at 75298) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Feb 2025 15:39:32 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 15 10:39:32 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57422 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tjKGR-0004sL-QZ for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2025 10:39:32 -0500 Received: from dancol.org ([2600:3c01:e000:3d8::1]:34780) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <dancol@HIDDEN>) id 1tjKGN-0004s9-Ef for 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2025 10:39:29 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dancol.org; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID: References:In-Reply-To:Subject:CC:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=+0NsatCMpy6SGVQkCviehjjc1Vc4yZqHy/eRamKgtwI=; b=hMCccvHeipFYWIP5JfM94VGzTB d8G1ukvMcjPFKQKuCzicFSsedn29Lva7tm0pEDrrr4ZYfpPSG9LJAZjeuu11KR/oED9FCLvhBpL0P lZxeCYPRuxFQMI9/xuckoPQB6xxqWCWzBZcb6RJkdE04RUQPeGdoo/nFSCbvOEyQs7wn58ipx5Qd2 6RvyfrxiL1rzDDHgJL0Qu+oLysnL8crezR+0KhbyNZ+xwt06QMyprBrigmeE1Z5usher8E5xiUIIz pm73e4QjaBzc2CaNCxazSd+aOomgAaA92HhUR9mcLCmdJr+c+8YNfuKQ0T+rWLr3mngdz2BHJBBbs GtxXfMAg==; Received: from [2600:1010:b019:b37d:0:28:5816:1601] (port=42932 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by dancol.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <dancol@HIDDEN>) id 1tjKGL-0003wH-1T; Sat, 15 Feb 2025 10:39:25 -0500 Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 07:39:17 -0800 From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@HIDDEN> To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#75298: GUD doesn't let me answer debuginfod query User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <86ikptg9pe.fsf@HIDDEN> References: <87o70p2g13.fsf@HIDDEN> <86seq1htal.fsf@HIDDEN> <8734i0c0kc.fsf@HIDDEN> <865xmwiai8.fsf@HIDDEN> <868qr8cwjy.fsf@HIDDEN> <86ikptg9pe.fsf@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <63ED3ABA-78E5-4605-89E3-ADDDF9300DB0@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75298 Cc: 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On February 1, 2025 3:56:13 AM PST, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu=2Eorg> wrote: >Ping! Ping! Daniel, could you please respond? > >> Cc: 75298@debbugs=2Egnu=2Eorg >> Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 11:15:29 +0200 >> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu=2Eorg> >>=20 >> Ping! Any additional information about this? I'd like to make some >> progress with this issue, at least to understand what is causing it >> and why can't I reproduce this on my system=2E >>=20 >> > Cc: 75298@debbugs=2Egnu=2Eorg >> > Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2025 10:09:51 +0200 >> > From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu=2Eorg> >> >=20 >> > > From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol=2Eorg> >> > > Cc: 75298@debbugs=2Egnu=2Eorg >> > > Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 17:28:51 -0500 >> > >=20 >> > > Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu=2Eorg> writes: >> > >=20 >> > > >> From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol=2Eorg> >> > > >> Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 14:04:56 -0500 >> > > >>=20 >> > > >> I'd expect to be able to answer the debuginfod query in the affi= rmative >> > > >> in the GUD session below, but nothing I put into the buffer seem= s >> > > >> acceptable to GDB=2E >> > > > >> > > > Which command did you use: "M-x gdb" or "M-x gud-gdb"? >> > >=20 >> > > The former=2E The latter works fine, but doesn't integrate into Em= acs=2E >> > >=20 >> > > > The former is supposed to allow you to answer the question, at le= ast >> > > > in Emacs 30 (you didn't say which Emacs version you used)=2E >> > >=20 >> > > I'm using master=2E >> >=20 >> > Then I cannot reproduce this here=2E >> >=20 >> > > > The latter doesn't ask me that question at all=2E So I'm unsure >> > > > what happens in your case=2E In case this is GDB-version depende= nt: >> > > > I tried with GDB version 12=2E1=2E >> > >=20 >> > > debuginfod isn't enabled in all environments, so you might not get >> > > the question=2E I'm using GDB 15=2E1=2E >> >=20 >> > Oh, I do get asked, and I can answer either 'n' or 'y'=2E But the >> > question I see is worded differently: >> >=20 >> > Enable querying debuginfod servers for this session? (y or n) y >> >=20 >> > This question comes from gdb-init-1, in this fragment: >> >=20 >> > ;; This needs to be done before we ask GDB for anything that might >> > ;; trigger questions about debuginfod queries=2E >> > (if (eq gdb-debuginfod-enable 'ask) >> > (setq gdb-debuginfod-enable >> > (y-or-n-p "Enable querying debuginfod servers for this se= ssion?"))) >> > (gdb-input (format "-gdb-set debuginfod enabled %s" >> > (if gdb-debuginfod-enable "on" "off")) >> > 'gdb-debuginfod-message) >> >=20 >> > It looks like in your case we fail to ask the above question before >> > GDB asks us about that, but what breaks the above assumption and >> > triggers GDB's question before we shut it up? It could be a differen= t >> > GDB version, I'm not sure=2E I don't have GDB 15 on the GNU/Linux >> > system where I can test this=2E >> >=20 >> > Is this in "emacs -Q", btw? If not, perhaps some customizations get >> > in the way? Or maybe some GDB customizations? >> >=20 >> > Can anyone else reproduce this with the master branch and GDB 15? >> >=20 >> > Anyway, as a stopgap, you should be able to avoid the question by >> > customizing gdb-debuginfod-enable-setting=2E If that doesn't work >> > either, it's possible that something causes GDB to ask this question >> > earlier than we anticipate, and we need to revisit this code (which >> > was tested at the time with GDB versions that asked about debuginfod)= =2E Haven't had a chance to experiment with GUD again recently
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
:bug#75298
; Package emacs
.
Full text available.Received: (at 75298) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2025 11:56:26 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 01 06:56:26 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56795 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1teC6r-0005ds-QK for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2025 06:56:26 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56388) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1teC6p-0005dc-IS for 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2025 06:56:24 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1teC6j-0006uY-2R; Sat, 01 Feb 2025 06:56:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=U4dPdjbuwWacDybsyzI2OliUK9ZlKg8qBUaMZzAENuw=; b=JRToOZmp/rHo vIr2FY5tet4Md6CFWh3DR7aspzLmItQD4EY4fO4uMh5HDzN+IVuPMBezxIhSX1H1siIwmZuZSSkuA sRRbPpRrgrt4h/tBXm0gvvCpzp+TmFQPjZMYcfbEBuCPuH2xhLMP/vOA6dDbxz4LkW+Kv71ZPPN1S GMkwPijGgoZvpVKo+i6OSigHpQ025z7CKH1LFlzP0eSoqpMKTh7k0Npkug9WEfU//G7751T4c+HeN DxsCgwp3+ieQhrLNUZPK5BUJr/k5xp7+Dd50QP4W7KAq8+/z5wKrKDeKLJyuTBBTYlocHXBH+8i5q idUPh5SXOWcoRNxQNb8Ifg==; Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2025 13:56:13 +0200 Message-Id: <86ikptg9pe.fsf@HIDDEN> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> To: dancol@HIDDEN In-Reply-To: <868qr8cwjy.fsf@HIDDEN> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 18 Jan 2025 11:15:29 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#75298: GUD doesn't let me answer debuginfod query References: <87o70p2g13.fsf@HIDDEN> <86seq1htal.fsf@HIDDEN> <8734i0c0kc.fsf@HIDDEN> <865xmwiai8.fsf@HIDDEN> <868qr8cwjy.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75298 Cc: 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Ping! Ping! Daniel, could you please respond? > Cc: 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 11:15:29 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> > > Ping! Any additional information about this? I'd like to make some > progress with this issue, at least to understand what is causing it > and why can't I reproduce this on my system. > > > Cc: 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org > > Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2025 10:09:51 +0200 > > From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> > > > > > From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@HIDDEN> > > > Cc: 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org > > > Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 17:28:51 -0500 > > > > > > Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes: > > > > > > >> From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@HIDDEN> > > > >> Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 14:04:56 -0500 > > > >> > > > >> I'd expect to be able to answer the debuginfod query in the affirmative > > > >> in the GUD session below, but nothing I put into the buffer seems > > > >> acceptable to GDB. > > > > > > > > Which command did you use: "M-x gdb" or "M-x gud-gdb"? > > > > > > The former. The latter works fine, but doesn't integrate into Emacs. > > > > > > > The former is supposed to allow you to answer the question, at least > > > > in Emacs 30 (you didn't say which Emacs version you used). > > > > > > I'm using master. > > > > Then I cannot reproduce this here. > > > > > > The latter doesn't ask me that question at all. So I'm unsure > > > > what happens in your case. In case this is GDB-version dependent: > > > > I tried with GDB version 12.1. > > > > > > debuginfod isn't enabled in all environments, so you might not get > > > the question. I'm using GDB 15.1. > > > > Oh, I do get asked, and I can answer either 'n' or 'y'. But the > > question I see is worded differently: > > > > Enable querying debuginfod servers for this session? (y or n) y > > > > This question comes from gdb-init-1, in this fragment: > > > > ;; This needs to be done before we ask GDB for anything that might > > ;; trigger questions about debuginfod queries. > > (if (eq gdb-debuginfod-enable 'ask) > > (setq gdb-debuginfod-enable > > (y-or-n-p "Enable querying debuginfod servers for this session?"))) > > (gdb-input (format "-gdb-set debuginfod enabled %s" > > (if gdb-debuginfod-enable "on" "off")) > > 'gdb-debuginfod-message) > > > > It looks like in your case we fail to ask the above question before > > GDB asks us about that, but what breaks the above assumption and > > triggers GDB's question before we shut it up? It could be a different > > GDB version, I'm not sure. I don't have GDB 15 on the GNU/Linux > > system where I can test this. > > > > Is this in "emacs -Q", btw? If not, perhaps some customizations get > > in the way? Or maybe some GDB customizations? > > > > Can anyone else reproduce this with the master branch and GDB 15? > > > > Anyway, as a stopgap, you should be able to avoid the question by > > customizing gdb-debuginfod-enable-setting. If that doesn't work > > either, it's possible that something causes GDB to ask this question > > earlier than we anticipate, and we need to revisit this code (which > > was tested at the time with GDB versions that asked about debuginfod). > > > > > > > > > > > >
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
:bug#75298
; Package emacs
.
Full text available.Received: (at 75298) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jan 2025 09:15:45 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 18 04:15:45 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40134 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tZ4vg-0000os-W7 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2025 04:15:45 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52430) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1tZ4ve-0000oc-Cx for 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2025 04:15:43 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1tZ4vT-0001oP-UQ; Sat, 18 Jan 2025 04:15:36 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=wU42+q8XoufSUYGC+6cnO6atKB2JQJjt3pEJ5A9RRi4=; b=jKKpBGxfiW0B vroeB1qWPMaqG/vpuvM32gWrhSLSKjIsd2oHAi1EzUwk1SinDXShltbF1KDA8mziQ8gQ9gtEhd/2b tEDR6WpHqUzZCtmlP1DH9cKkPo8hVxm6RYw13EudsaM1+msWWZmzqVkh2T6/kDaeisUZoJzNGe+0P R5A0HwHIDenPboYm3xwukzH5tP9Tmi3c7Qw4mcGsEjq+cmz9eX9lBJAy0wiYzn0rs6B6uUyh3dfKB s4/loJptC1JL7H2uJaV3+yqom9qUJY6O5sFWwbkJlGPwEXjd1yVoqtnbhSbyAUpNWavsdkosc42oQ jTXcohY9sjnXCQ34HWe3NQ==; Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 11:15:29 +0200 Message-Id: <868qr8cwjy.fsf@HIDDEN> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> To: dancol@HIDDEN In-Reply-To: <865xmwiai8.fsf@HIDDEN> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Fri, 03 Jan 2025 10:09:51 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#75298: GUD doesn't let me answer debuginfod query References: <87o70p2g13.fsf@HIDDEN> <86seq1htal.fsf@HIDDEN> <8734i0c0kc.fsf@HIDDEN> <865xmwiai8.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75298 Cc: 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Ping! Any additional information about this? I'd like to make some progress with this issue, at least to understand what is causing it and why can't I reproduce this on my system. > Cc: 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2025 10:09:51 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> > > > From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@HIDDEN> > > Cc: 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org > > Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 17:28:51 -0500 > > > > Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes: > > > > >> From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@HIDDEN> > > >> Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 14:04:56 -0500 > > >> > > >> I'd expect to be able to answer the debuginfod query in the affirmative > > >> in the GUD session below, but nothing I put into the buffer seems > > >> acceptable to GDB. > > > > > > Which command did you use: "M-x gdb" or "M-x gud-gdb"? > > > > The former. The latter works fine, but doesn't integrate into Emacs. > > > > > The former is supposed to allow you to answer the question, at least > > > in Emacs 30 (you didn't say which Emacs version you used). > > > > I'm using master. > > Then I cannot reproduce this here. > > > > The latter doesn't ask me that question at all. So I'm unsure > > > what happens in your case. In case this is GDB-version dependent: > > > I tried with GDB version 12.1. > > > > debuginfod isn't enabled in all environments, so you might not get > > the question. I'm using GDB 15.1. > > Oh, I do get asked, and I can answer either 'n' or 'y'. But the > question I see is worded differently: > > Enable querying debuginfod servers for this session? (y or n) y > > This question comes from gdb-init-1, in this fragment: > > ;; This needs to be done before we ask GDB for anything that might > ;; trigger questions about debuginfod queries. > (if (eq gdb-debuginfod-enable 'ask) > (setq gdb-debuginfod-enable > (y-or-n-p "Enable querying debuginfod servers for this session?"))) > (gdb-input (format "-gdb-set debuginfod enabled %s" > (if gdb-debuginfod-enable "on" "off")) > 'gdb-debuginfod-message) > > It looks like in your case we fail to ask the above question before > GDB asks us about that, but what breaks the above assumption and > triggers GDB's question before we shut it up? It could be a different > GDB version, I'm not sure. I don't have GDB 15 on the GNU/Linux > system where I can test this. > > Is this in "emacs -Q", btw? If not, perhaps some customizations get > in the way? Or maybe some GDB customizations? > > Can anyone else reproduce this with the master branch and GDB 15? > > Anyway, as a stopgap, you should be able to avoid the question by > customizing gdb-debuginfod-enable-setting. If that doesn't work > either, it's possible that something causes GDB to ask this question > earlier than we anticipate, and we need to revisit this code (which > was tested at the time with GDB versions that asked about debuginfod). > > > >
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
:bug#75298
; Package emacs
.
Full text available.Received: (at 75298) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jan 2025 08:10:39 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 03 03:10:38 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49383 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tTclS-0000eA-CP for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2025 03:10:38 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34582) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1tTclL-0000ds-Mi for 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2025 03:10:37 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1tTclF-0005Uj-L2; Fri, 03 Jan 2025 03:10:25 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=7cBLRqjW37TEkZAcpLxqrV+5LGp1qavl6kn6FRjmOhk=; b=J/VoNIRZQIYn 0DSSE2XoC2aooyaPVTEePIBFX6c+eznJg6QA9VEzyXyZobfb4MkULr26BAdM6tflYsD0aXWp4P2tN wtW4JhOYpeE/JaCxqsgVyBB2md9L7B6Tv22DPdVJDH57xcj2jTaJoFqfEDv8a44RxRRcKBVV6BXiW o6nqPNa1G5X1pco7Qri7ZHemlXcrlPR7+beC5p9BWBPRcZuHa/q9dVZDpIYBWUX1UYoESu+hutuaN 73jpcW3uwCvTDMNWKKLvZgfrPE7GEt6+t8MmtK0ZWDBTlUUJh4k0kc+FZmE2p2+g8nLXs70QQQAny /xcGvewYFDwJ0/4qVoIViw==; Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2025 10:09:51 +0200 Message-Id: <865xmwiai8.fsf@HIDDEN> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> To: Daniel Colascione <dancol@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <8734i0c0kc.fsf@HIDDEN> (message from Daniel Colascione on Thu, 02 Jan 2025 17:28:51 -0500) Subject: Re: bug#75298: GUD doesn't let me answer debuginfod query References: <87o70p2g13.fsf@HIDDEN> <86seq1htal.fsf@HIDDEN> <8734i0c0kc.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75298 Cc: 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@HIDDEN> > Cc: 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 17:28:51 -0500 > > Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes: > > >> From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@HIDDEN> > >> Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 14:04:56 -0500 > >> > >> I'd expect to be able to answer the debuginfod query in the affirmative > >> in the GUD session below, but nothing I put into the buffer seems > >> acceptable to GDB. > > > > Which command did you use: "M-x gdb" or "M-x gud-gdb"? > > The former. The latter works fine, but doesn't integrate into Emacs. > > > The former is supposed to allow you to answer the question, at least > > in Emacs 30 (you didn't say which Emacs version you used). > > I'm using master. Then I cannot reproduce this here. > > The latter doesn't ask me that question at all. So I'm unsure > > what happens in your case. In case this is GDB-version dependent: > > I tried with GDB version 12.1. > > debuginfod isn't enabled in all environments, so you might not get > the question. I'm using GDB 15.1. Oh, I do get asked, and I can answer either 'n' or 'y'. But the question I see is worded differently: Enable querying debuginfod servers for this session? (y or n) y This question comes from gdb-init-1, in this fragment: ;; This needs to be done before we ask GDB for anything that might ;; trigger questions about debuginfod queries. (if (eq gdb-debuginfod-enable 'ask) (setq gdb-debuginfod-enable (y-or-n-p "Enable querying debuginfod servers for this session?"))) (gdb-input (format "-gdb-set debuginfod enabled %s" (if gdb-debuginfod-enable "on" "off")) 'gdb-debuginfod-message) It looks like in your case we fail to ask the above question before GDB asks us about that, but what breaks the above assumption and triggers GDB's question before we shut it up? It could be a different GDB version, I'm not sure. I don't have GDB 15 on the GNU/Linux system where I can test this. Is this in "emacs -Q", btw? If not, perhaps some customizations get in the way? Or maybe some GDB customizations? Can anyone else reproduce this with the master branch and GDB 15? Anyway, as a stopgap, you should be able to avoid the question by customizing gdb-debuginfod-enable-setting. If that doesn't work either, it's possible that something causes GDB to ask this question earlier than we anticipate, and we need to revisit this code (which was tested at the time with GDB versions that asked about debuginfod).
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
:bug#75298
; Package emacs
.
Full text available.Received: (at 75298) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jan 2025 22:28:56 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 02 17:28:56 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47050 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tTTgW-0004m1-1m for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 17:28:56 -0500 Received: from dancol.org ([2600:3c01:e000:3d8::1]:49096) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <dancol@HIDDEN>) id 1tTTgU-0004lq-4V for 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 17:28:55 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dancol.org; s=x; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To: Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=B59VVIOVuSvQ+oFpwc6T+MgtYFQ+RpSd+jC2ldJMVdU=; b=cHMwBjXSEPdTbkLqHfpBHZWw+f X3vHgQNzyB3p7R6Teb4mDCGOPIvSmnn9whVQnvI6izq3eWhfoHI8MXndK9Po1LXVH9EAmXVlcUrXu JtTXik79gFZcBwJPra2QDd6xVO3ynSBn5c7RuBg54UXmCujyTZMsR+W07BXTY8G8OLH18Js15nEKz yIj14YfGZBsnZYCLrENHn1RgBfawEr+pATern/ejIxR5luG6QKeJuXC21BQom4i4LK+iAAGqYu8wF 06kDGrQQkeBN9AXQ6M4XLCVDvdKMqPpdiGyPivNV1jPI/STS4rZ5myORMCRtYTy16jbhqci24w6f5 y0nKXW5A==; Received: from 2603-9001-4203-1ab2-bd9e-ad89-4d97-f163.inf6.spectrum.com ([2603:9001:4203:1ab2:bd9e:ad89:4d97:f163]:36156 helo=localhost) by dancol.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <dancol@HIDDEN>) id 1tTTgS-0002AI-1f; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 17:28:52 -0500 From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@HIDDEN> To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#75298: GUD doesn't let me answer debuginfod query In-Reply-To: <86seq1htal.fsf@HIDDEN> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 02 Jan 2025 22:09:22 +0200") References: <87o70p2g13.fsf@HIDDEN> <86seq1htal.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.8; emacs 31.0.50 Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 17:28:51 -0500 Message-ID: <8734i0c0kc.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75298 Cc: 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes: >> From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@HIDDEN> >> Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 14:04:56 -0500 >> >> I'd expect to be able to answer the debuginfod query in the affirmative >> in the GUD session below, but nothing I put into the buffer seems >> acceptable to GDB. > > Which command did you use: "M-x gdb" or "M-x gud-gdb"? The former. The latter works fine, but doesn't integrate into Emacs. > The former is supposed to allow you to answer the question, at least > in Emacs 30 (you didn't say which Emacs version you used). I'm using master. > The latter > doesn't ask me that question at all. So I'm unsure what happens in > your case. In case this is GDB-version dependent: I tried with GDB > version 12.1. debuginfod isn't enabled in all environments, so you might not get the question. I'm using GDB 15.1.
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
:bug#75298
; Package emacs
.
Full text available.Received: (at 75298) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jan 2025 20:09:49 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 02 15:09:49 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46845 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tTRVt-0005Re-6X for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 15:09:49 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54122) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1tTRVq-0005RM-U8 for 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 15:09:47 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1tTRVk-0000PF-OZ; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 15:09:40 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=a/74+Qit8WiOeci1R34A6o93qcybl9FJ7juRMf2Sztw=; b=B5Gk2PG16n4x SiHT6Cxn0WTgGNOkI/SDspt/ES6qkkXMOkwJEUZ8xuNYFfMJgW5IawsVDQT/HN1UjpY/PkLpWUZcs rxfms0C+QD29CefHTyxCZ/09YTeWGKVCO0+uEGip7o/g7iSAMjI1MpASMidR2Ck/pyG0EF/p2lDQ0 HERhMtmKeF9O1OdpfUXrc7scQp2KCryD8NP9oTSI+GPvT7snLI+nDoASBdN3OpNBBg5286Eu2Q1ec H+M/Qt3ozoRMrcF5vCydOmYu4ZqtbOXoVY43mUi6PfytOa565DqHBw2om3ZtAtqh1kDYQSrBiOUHS uCGC8ft3i6LVLVEa8Mguhg==; Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 22:09:22 +0200 Message-Id: <86seq1htal.fsf@HIDDEN> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> To: Daniel Colascione <dancol@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <87o70p2g13.fsf@HIDDEN> (message from Daniel Colascione on Thu, 02 Jan 2025 14:04:56 -0500) Subject: Re: bug#75298: GUD doesn't let me answer debuginfod query References: <87o70p2g13.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75298 Cc: 75298 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@HIDDEN> > Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 14:04:56 -0500 > > I'd expect to be able to answer the debuginfod query in the affirmative > in the GUD session below, but nothing I put into the buffer seems > acceptable to GDB. Which command did you use: "M-x gdb" or "M-x gud-gdb"? The former is supposed to allow you to answer the question, at least in Emacs 30 (you didn't say which Emacs version you used). The latter doesn't ask me that question at all. So I'm unsure what happens in your case. In case this is GDB-version dependent: I tried with GDB version 12.1.
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
:bug#75298
; Package emacs
.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jan 2025 19:05:10 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 02 14:05:10 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46686 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tTQVK-0001hY-2U for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 14:05:10 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:52722) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <dancol@HIDDEN>) id 1tTQVH-0001bN-8j for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 14:05:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <dancol@HIDDEN>) id 1tTQVB-00057c-AW for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 14:05:01 -0500 Received: from dancol.org ([2600:3c01:e000:3d8::1]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <dancol@HIDDEN>) id 1tTQV9-0004f7-2D for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 14:05:01 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dancol.org; s=x; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Sender: Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=YmXfW8qqc3/G5OkFcyMJmX+RWok7eC/ivTXRVUdTQmE=; b=fO5C46Km1rPDicNj1JRhwWZfVT mBGYPAQvVsltwwI5byRm0fPxv4GRAPLck6cJz7XiXd0YqHBYzOA0wtQDrByvdEBTrm7XAOpBGjxVm iBIGACzG1Cw5sPG33awAEz1TIV2vvTK0f2TzMcPyzPPppIB9529JhNpJH2chym+kgRZKwiANz4LOF NNsMxstekjHvvXPApSb3P5oJIUrnAl1ZR89qnT361MAn8EsimMJ3CMwXgp/0hzXIPICfw+KQF40RT zeODdtso4K+wxyCJ9qrFvXsfkbmsnDi9ViqDwDeNKOm59a40AIzdCfVXr2snhSf80lsumaDw/L7jr JBAFUp2A==; Received: from 2603-9001-4203-1ab2-bd9e-ad89-4d97-f163.inf6.spectrum.com ([2603:9001:4203:1ab2:bd9e:ad89:4d97:f163]:50698 helo=localhost) by dancol.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <dancol@HIDDEN>) id 1tTQV6-0001KD-33 for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 14:04:57 -0500 From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@HIDDEN> To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Subject: GUD doesn't let me answer debuginfod query User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.8; emacs 31.0.50 Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 14:04:56 -0500 Message-ID: <87o70p2g13.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2600:3c01:e000:3d8::1; envelope-from=dancol@HIDDEN; helo=dancol.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) I'd expect to be able to answer the debuginfod query in the affirmative in the GUD session below, but nothing I put into the buffer seems acceptable to GDB. Current directory is /home/dancol/edev/debug/ GNU gdb (Ubuntu 15.1-1ubuntu2) 15.1 Copyright (C) 2024 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-linux-gnu". Type "show configuration" for configuration details. For bug reporting instructions, please see: <https://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>. Find the GDB manual and other documentation resources online at: <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/documentation/>. For help, type "help". Type "apropos word" to search for commands related to "word"... Reading symbols from /home/dancol/.cache/rr/emacs-5/mmap_clone_5_emacs... Really redefine built-in command "restart"? (y or n) [answered Y; input not from terminal] Really redefine built-in command "jump"? (y or n) [answered Y; input not from terminal] Remote debugging using 127.0.0.1:31571 Reading symbols from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2... Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/b3/3a9ce38781b940e741fd85448861a71ff2297b.debug... warning: BFD: warning: system-supplied DSO at 0x6fffd000 has a section extending past end of file This GDB supports auto-downloading debuginfo from the following URLs: <https://debuginfod.ubuntu.com> Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) Please answer y or [n]. Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) Please answer y or [n]. Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) Please answer y or [n]. Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) Please answer y or [n]. Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) Please answer y or [n]. Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) Please answer y or [n]. Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) Please answer y or [n]. Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) Please answer y or [n]. Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) Please answer y or [n]. Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) Please answer y or [n]. Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) Please answer y or [n]. Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) Please answer y or [n]. Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) Please answer y or [n]. Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) Please answer y or [n]. Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) y Please answer y or [n]. Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) y Please answer y or [n]. Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) [y] Please answer y or [n]. Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) y Please answer y or [n]. Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) yes Please answer y or [n]. Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) y Please answer y or [n]. Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) y Please answer y or [n]. Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) y Please answer y or [n]. Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) Y Please answer y or [n]. Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) eat flaming death Please answer y or [n]. Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n])
Daniel Colascione <dancol@HIDDEN>
:bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
.
Full text available.bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
:bug#75298
; Package emacs
.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.