Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
Full text available.Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
Full text available.Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
Full text available.Received: (at 66582) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Oct 2023 03:29:39 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 16 23:29:39 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58259 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1qsam2-0001LQ-Us for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 23:29:39 -0400 Received: from woodpecker.gentoo.org ([140.211.166.183]:60610 helo=smtp.gentoo.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <sam@HIDDEN>) id 1qsalx-0001L1-0A for 66582 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 23:29:37 -0400 References: <20231016174439.415263.FMU1197@HIDDEN> User-agent: mu4e 1.10.7; emacs 30.0.50 From: Sam James <sam@HIDDEN> To: Noah Friedman <noah@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#66582: annoying, needless warning messages from [fe]grep Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 04:28:30 +0100 Organization: Gentoo In-reply-to: <20231016174439.415263.FMU1197@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <874jiqj5ae.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 66582 Cc: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN, 66582 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Noah Friedman <noah@HIDDEN> writes: > Just because a program is considered deprecated or obsolete by a standards > committee, is no reason to actually force that program out of use or > availablity. And since when does GNU adhere strictly to POSIX anyway? grep is not from coreutils. As for the issue you discuss, it's being brought up on the grep mailing lists already (and I agree with the whole thing being silly).
bug-coreutils@HIDDEN
:bug#66582
; Package coreutils
.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Oct 2023 03:29:50 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 16 23:29:50 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58262 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1qsamE-0001Ls-9x for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 23:29:50 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:57034) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <sam@HIDDEN>) id 1qsamB-0001LZ-NY for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 23:29:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <sam@HIDDEN>) id 1qsald-0002nZ-RJ for bug-coreutils@HIDDEN; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 23:29:14 -0400 Received: from woodpecker.gentoo.org ([2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4] helo=smtp.gentoo.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <sam@HIDDEN>) id 1qsalb-00043v-Lm for bug-coreutils@HIDDEN; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 23:29:13 -0400 References: <20231016174439.415263.FMU1197@HIDDEN> User-agent: mu4e 1.10.7; emacs 30.0.50 From: Sam James <sam@HIDDEN> To: Noah Friedman <noah@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#66582: annoying, needless warning messages from [fe]grep Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 04:28:30 +0100 Organization: Gentoo In-reply-to: <20231016174439.415263.FMU1197@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <874jiqj5ae.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4; envelope-from=sam@HIDDEN; helo=smtp.gentoo.org X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN, 66582 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) Noah Friedman <noah@HIDDEN> writes: > Just because a program is considered deprecated or obsolete by a standards > committee, is no reason to actually force that program out of use or > availablity. And since when does GNU adhere strictly to POSIX anyway? grep is not from coreutils. As for the issue you discuss, it's being brought up on the grep mailing lists already (and I agree with the whole thing being silly).
bug-coreutils@HIDDEN
:bug#66582
; Package coreutils
.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Oct 2023 00:45:37 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 16 20:45:37 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58208 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1qsYDJ-0004AR-11 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 20:45:37 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:35738) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <noah@HIDDEN>) id 1qsYDF-0004A6-7X for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 20:45:35 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <noah@HIDDEN>) id 1qsYCk-0001DS-EM for bug-coreutils@HIDDEN; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 20:45:02 -0400 Received: from bacon-event-horizon.splode.com ([2600:3c01:e000:3d5:f03c:91ff:fe96:f92b]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <noah@HIDDEN>) id 1qsYCi-0001CU-Mw for bug-coreutils@HIDDEN; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 20:45:02 -0400 Received: from unexploded-cow.prv.splode.com (71-212-88-31.tukw.qwest.net [71.212.88.31]) (authenticated bits=0) by bacon-event-horizon.splode.com (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPSA id 39H0idJx115467 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <bug-coreutils@HIDDEN>; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 17:44:53 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=splode.com; s=splode-20130101; t=1697503493; bh=0pg98P1pPU3O/7T0oPmbflAKLLT0MB8HEhR7S1AuDzc=; h=From:To:Subject:Reply-To:Date:From; b=mB4trb5SlnZh3XkZ/zyBH11doTd67/PyQIskN+K3Tarh5r0w6JeAZIazyy+FW57Gv hw7uDAkNTFzmBl8tz0qVSyPzlcWESz4lE5JEQ0L43VFYKyshUNpLDYt1U9kDm6k/Ff gWknPPY5BjHri9gYTKI1+uMoVlV/52CdpsuJpjyk= From: Noah Friedman <noah@HIDDEN> To: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN Subject: annoying, needless warning messages from [fe]grep Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 17:44:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20231016174439.415263.FMU1197@HIDDEN> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (bacon-event-horizon.splode.com [74.207.245.10]); Mon, 16 Oct 2023 17:44:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,T_DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on bacon-event-horizon.splode.com Received-SPF: none client-ip=2600:3c01:e000:3d5:f03c:91ff:fe96:f92b; envelope-from=noah@HIDDEN; helo=bacon-event-horizon.splode.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Reply-To: Noah Friedman <noah@HIDDEN> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Just because a program is considered deprecated or obsolete by a standards committee, is no reason to actually force that program out of use or availablity. And since when does GNU adhere strictly to POSIX anyway? So my bug report is this: fgrep and egrep should not emit any warning on stderr about being obsolescent unless the environment POSIXLY_CORRECT is set. If you want to be *really* pedantic, it shouldn't emit a warning unless POSIXLY_CORRECT is set to the specific standards level (or above) in which it was declared obsolete. :-P Because goddammit, there are 40 years worth of old programs out there that are going to keep using egrep, and as a crusty 50+ year old myself, I'm not planning to train my fingers out of using it either. Just let some things *be*.
Noah Friedman <noah@HIDDEN>
:bug-coreutils@HIDDEN
.
Full text available.bug-coreutils@HIDDEN
:bug#66582
; Package coreutils
.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.